The correct answers are the sentences: It used to be generally assumed. This assumption led to very conflicting opinions respecting the disease. We have no right thus to limit the way in which a disease may be propagated.
Indeed, the first sentence clearly states that it was a general assumption, and assumptions are not scientific facts. A description of such erroneous assessment follows. The second sentence about the “conflicting opinions’ shows that there was no consensus or coherence that could validate this assumption. Finally, the third sentence is a conclusion with a very categorical assertion, which is immediately followed by an indication of why such conclusion is valid.
Answer:
It's Defrestation
Explanation:
Humans aren't really capable of causeing earthquakes or floods. While we can generate wind, it doesn't really damage anything. Humans do cut down trees and this does very much harm the envoirnment so deforestation is your awnser. (The third one down)
The writers wanted to emphasize that the ability to set up and start a new government came from the people of the United States.
Answer:
ok uh sorry for taking your points but I wanna help you out. I don't think someone's gonna write a whole essay for you but props if they do. you can pay someone for cheap to write it on different websites you find
What do you mean by that?
