1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lina2011 [118]
3 years ago
11

will mark brainiest Kurt Vonnegut obviously had strong feelings about certain aspects of society. Discuss how he used this short

story harison bergeron to reveal his feelings about the following elements of society (use specific examples from the story to argue your point): Our overuse of laws to control people Our ways of censoring people that are above average in various ways
English
1 answer:
soldier1979 [14.2K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

 In the beginning of the story, the reader is given a picture of the world that Diana Moon Glampers watches upon:

The year was 2081, and everybody was finally equal.  They weren't only equal before God and the law.  They were equal every which way.  Nobody was smarter than anybody else.  Nobody was better looking than anybody else.  Nobody was stronger or quicker than anybody else.  All this equality was due to the…Amendments to the Constitution, and…vigilance of agents of the United States Handicapper General.  (Vonnegut 234)  

Diana Moon Glampers is the one who maintains the idea of "checks and balances" among the society of 2081.  In God Bless You, Mr. Rosewater, Glampers is portrayed as a "sixty-year-old virgin who, by almost anybody's standards, was too dumb to live….No one had ever loved her.  There was no reason why anybody should. She was ugly, stupid, and boring" (Vit).  Diana Moon Glampers is the epitome of every possible low in the world, and this allows her to hold such a high position in this futuristic society.  Since everyone is created equal, her ugliness, stupidity, and boringness all play this major role in earning her such a high position as Handicapper General. She makes sure that no on is better than her, thus making everyone equal in "every which way" possible.  Glampers represents the fairness that society is continually striving for to obtain.  In this world, everyone stays at the same level-- no one is different, no one is jealous or fearful of anyone, and no one is trying to impress or overtake the next.  In this sense, it is actually quite a positive point to be exactly equal in every way, or is it?

           Equality is a great idea that the world should extend and embrace; however, absolute equality is another issue in which too much of a good thing may cause matters to go wrong.  In a world of absolute equality, each human being would never be looked upon as anything more or less than the person beside him or her.  Unfortunately, this advantage may only go so far.  For example, how can an intelligent being be given as much credit as the simple minded human beside him?  This is the case with Harrison Bergeron's parents.  Harrison's mother, Hazel, is described as having "perfectly average intelligence,…And  [while] George['s]…intelligence was way above normal" (Vonnegut 234).  In order to stabilize their intelligence to the same level, Harrison's father has to wear "a little mental handicap radio in his ear" (Vonnegut 234).  

Explanation:

You might be interested in
FASTTTTTTTTTT...
padilas [110]

Answer:

B. questions that help you look for grammar and spelling mistakes is the answer.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In which revision are Clause 1 and Clause 2 both independent?
CaHeK987 [17]
I think the last revision is the answer, as both are independent of each other and tell us two separate clauses in the same sentence
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PART A: What does the word “petulantly” mean, as it is used in paragraph 10?
liraira [26]
The answer is showing sudden irritation
4 0
4 years ago
The main idea of "The Kidney Thieves" is that
JulsSmile [24]
 A  is the right answer

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I need this for a unit test PLEASE HELP
natulia [17]

Answer:

A). They went to great lengths to ensure that their tombs would not be robbed.

Explanation:

As per the descriptions provided in the excerpt, it can be concluded that 'the pharaohs of ancient Egypt went to great lengths to ensure that their tombs would not be robbed.' To protect the tombs from being robbed, they were preserved inside the grand pyramids as they had an inner threat that if their tombs are robbed, their afterlife might be under threat. Thus, <u>option A</u> is the correct answer.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which are the main characteristics of American Indian creation stories
    8·1 answer
  • What were some beliefs about witchcraft and witches people held in the past??
    6·1 answer
  • Roald dahl landlady secret
    5·1 answer
  • Indicate whether the following is a sentence or a fragment.
    15·1 answer
  • (YOU WILL GET BRAINIEST IF YOU ANSWER CORRECTLY!) This question is from the Odyssey! :)
    13·2 answers
  • What is a pair of cognate words? Can you give me an example?
    15·1 answer
  • hich of the following reflects the proper punctuation of the above sentence? “Should states require adolescents to be eighteen b
    11·1 answer
  • Give 5 major events in the hobbit
    15·1 answer
  • Is there any difference between being responsible and accepting responsibility? Explain. ​
    12·1 answer
  • the managing director has given his _______ to increase the salaries of the employees ( ascent or assent)​
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!