Answer:
brand risk, demand risk, price risk, product development
Explanation:
marketing risk is a potential for losses and failures in marketing.
brand risk : this is the risk that the product would lose it value due to competition and failures in declining brand awareness. it is likely to to affect a new product if prevailing measures are not taken to curb such risk.
demand risk: this is the risk that the demand for the product being advertised will fall or fail to materialized. this is likely to occur when there is a shift in customer needs or choice.
price risk: this is related to a risk that the price tag on the product campaign may vary higher than competitor price.
product development: this risk is related to launching and developing a new product. there is likely hood that new product has a higher percentage of not succeeding in the market.
A balanced scorecard approach creates goals in four key performance areas and assesses financial, customer, internal processes, and people. A balanced scorecard helps train employees and lets them know what they will be evaluated on. KPI helps them plan and assess performance and gives the employees a way to help the overall company performance.
In an organization with compensation that has <u>hybrid outcome interdependence</u>, a <u>given </u>portion of the employee's pay depends on the team's output and performance.
Hybrid outcome interdependence refers to the terms of employment in which a team’s output and performance determines a specified portion of the members’ salary. So, if their performance fails to meet given targets or standards, members will end up getting lower pay.
On the other hand, there are incentive structures linked to such arrangements, so that overachieving the targets would lead to members receiving a bonus.
Hybrid outcome interdependence is a key corporate strategy to ensure employees put in their best effort, as incentive and disincentive structures are built into the pay structure.
To learn more about hybrid outcome interdependence: brainly.com/question/28195254
#SPJ4
Answer:
The statement given is TRUE:
Explanation: Most of CBMS left in 2008, there was vacuum that was left. Banks just decided to clean up their balance sheets, and did not participate. The life insurance companies took advantage of this period and increased their origination and thus increased the lending to this sector where there was a huge vacuum.
