Question

Read the following claim. Life on Earth could not exist without decomposers. What evidence from the article supports this claim? Explain why the evidence supports this claim.

Answer 1

Answer:

Explanation:

It's hard to distinguish facts/ evidence from the article with only the statement ' Life on earth could not exist without decomposers', but taking that into consideration, it's best if you breakdown the information so you properly understand what it means.

Life on earth - refers to evolution of life on earth such as single celled organisms, eukaryotes, prokaryotes, bacteria and so on

could not exist - refers to the inability of it being there, it's presence is basically there/ not there

decomposers - is an organism that breaks down organic materials from dead organisms to obtain energy such as fungi, bacteria, worms and so forth.

You basically need to relate all the information you find in the 'article' to the statement they have made and which i have broken down for you above.

Answer 2

Answer:

No sé qué es, pero creo que lo más probable es que se construya por postposición y que los pequeños artículos alrededor de las celdas se puedan.

Explanation:

al menos se puede transferir a nwje woss asqueroso ew ¿qué pasa si lo que maullas?