<span>"The world would be better off if political boundaries didn't exist" is an indefensible claim. The others can be proven or at least debated over because at some point in time all of them have true and false. For instance, the majority of congress and the President have been from the same political party. Also, the majority of congress and the President have NOT been from the same political party. Therefore, you can compare the difference between true and false. Political boundaries have always existed. As a result, you cannot comfortably compare it to anything else.</span>
A huge increase in the population combined with the industrial revolution led to a huge increase in crime. People migrated from rural areas to cities, there was a surplus of labor. The rise in crime was surprising for the authorities and it was difficult to control it, because ordinary people who were happy before were involved in crime. They were poor, unqualified people; for some, crime was an easy way to get to the money, and for other survival methods. Even children were engaged by adults, because it was easy to manipulate them, and they were paid less. As an emergence of crime, there is a drunkenness, which again contributes to a further increase in crime. People were unhappy because they did not have a job, they could not survive, they had solace in alcohol, become addicted, and then necessarily, began to steal to meet their needs, both basic and alcohol needs.
Answer: 1. 1. Serfs had to life in small, crowded cottages. 2. Serfs had to share their cottages with livestock and other animals. 2. Towns grew larger. ... Merchants from all over traveled to these towns to trade. Guilds were formed and they set standards for their products. brainliest
Explanation:
Answer:
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
Explanation:
this law protects freedom of religion, saying that the goverment will protect and help people who are being opressed because of what they believe
Answer:
In 1792 Washington utilized his presidential veto power to stop an apportionment act from becoming law.
Explanation:
In 1792 during the agitation for the formation of the number of representatives each state would provide in the federal House, Congress proposed a certain bill of apportionment act.
However, if the bill was passed, it would change the distribution and formation of federal House seats among the states. An outcome Washington deemed unconstitutional.
Hence, George Washington's presidency highlighted his power and authority to enforce the law by utilizing his presidential veto power to stop an apportionment act from becoming law.
