1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gala2k [10]
3 years ago
10

Why did the boycott succeed? Were the actions of both the citizens of Montgomery as well as those of the US Supreme Court necess

ary for its success?
History
1 answer:
professor190 [17]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The boycott and protest was led by Martin Luther King Jr and this was because of the discrimination of a black lady called Rosa Parks in a bus in Montgomery.She was arrested for not giving up her seat for a white person to use. The blacks decided to boycott the usage of the buses for several months. The boycott was later called off when the Supreme Court pointed out that the segregation was unconstitutional.

Yes, the citizens of Montgomery as well as those of the US Supreme Court was necessary for its success.

You might be interested in
What nations were responsible for managing the four zones in germany, established at the yalta conference?
emmainna [20.7K]
Great Britain, France, The United States and The Soviet Union
5 0
3 years ago
The biggest problem facing George H. W. Bush when he became president was?
Rama09 [41]

Answer:

The major issues that Bush faced while President included the tension and conflict in the Middle East as well as what to do with the dissolved Soviet Union.

4 0
3 years ago
What impact did the War of 1812 have on American nationalism (national identity)?
Ulleksa [173]
The correct answer should be
<span>Although the conflict was indecisive, it boosted American nationalism because the American army and navy proved they could stand up to the most powerful country in Europe.

It can't be called a decisive victory or a defeat for anyone since the war ended in a stalemate and nothing got resolved. The situation returned to how it was before the war politically, except they didn't want to go to war anymore. This meant that no boundary changes occurred. </span>
<span />
5 0
3 years ago
Why do historians need to be careful about being unbaised when presenting historical facts?
Klio2033 [76]
The historians could be wrong without proper proof to back up their so-called "facts". Therefore, they would need to study and know what they're talking about, before presenting their statements as facts.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Answer this question before making any changes to spending percentages. What was the budget deficit in 2012?
Roman55 [17]
1.1 trillion dollars
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What did China agree to do once the Treaty of Nanjing was signed
    14·2 answers
  • This egyptian god is believed to control the earth and vegetation
    5·2 answers
  • When people focus on what would benefit their region or section of the country, rather than the nation as a whole it is called w
    14·1 answer
  • What is the name of the document signed by King John that limited power of the English Monarchy and provided rights to the noble
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following arguments can best be used to support the claim, "freedom of religion is directly tied to democracy"?
    8·1 answer
  • Which describes the first battle of the American Revolution?
    14·2 answers
  • Help me, i need the two questions about Ben franklin!!!!!
    11·1 answer
  • How did Germany cause WWI
    10·1 answer
  • Why did Russians Jews move to america
    14·1 answer
  • The New England colonies' economy relied heavily on
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!