This view is not plausible because god is not plausible.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
because in the extract helmer said and I quote will it be any good to you
Answer:
a. It criticizes the way some readers try to understand a poem
Explanation:
Billy Collins makes a great reference to how some readers try to understand a poem, by saying that they begin beating it with a hose, trying to explain that they take everything too rough and do not consider all the factors, nor try with the care and importance that analyzing a poem should have, he writes in his poem the ways to understand a poem, speaks about
"I want them to waterski
across the surface of a poem
waving at the author’s name on the shore."
Speaking about a way of getting to know the poem and investigate, about feeling it and letting it take you places, but all what readers want to do is easily and quickly understand it.
Answer:
1. he WENT to town yesterday.
2.
3.
4. He has to two sons.
5. Rice is eaten by mother.
Explan
Sorry i don't know the rest.
So this is not an easy question, but here is a good way to go about it. Try and read each sentence alone and see if the sentence lends itself to the adjectives(descriptive words) be attached to the wrong noun(object). I believe that the answer to this question is D, because the prepositional phrase "in his suit and tie" is closer to dog which makes it sound like the dog is the one in a suit and tie, not dad. The sentence would be better written "Yesterday, my dad, in his suit and tie, walked the dog.
