This question is based from "<span>Robinson Crusoe Escape from the Island". And based on this story, what makes Crusoe different from the Spanish and the English masters who were left behind to develop the island is that he had survived through working hard and being resourceful, while these masters were unproductive and lazy. The answer is option A.</span>
A. Crusoe survives through hard work and resourcefulness, whereas the other masters were lazy and unproductive.
Explanation:
Robinson Crusoe is wrecked and castaway on a disengaged sultry island for a long time. The story might be founded on the genuine beneficial encounters of Alexander Selkirk, a Scottish castaway who kept going four years on a Pacific island, or Henry Pitman,a federal innovator operator castaway from a Caribbean reformatory colony.
Self-sufficiency and diligent work are the methods utilized by Crusoe helping him endure, and particularly cooperating with everyone around him, interestingly with past English and Spanish masters.
A removes the double negative by replacing “nothing” with “anything”. C also removes the double negative but it’s not grammatically correct so A is the best choice.
