I think they are quality of information, leisure to digest it and the right to carry out actions based on what we learn from the interaction of the first two.
Paragraph about pronouns:
In linguistics and grammar, a pronoun has been theorized to be a word that substitutes for a noun or noun phrase. It is a particular case of a pro-form. Examples include:
anybody, anyone, anything, each, either, everybody, everyone, everything, neither, nobody, no one, nothing, one, somebody, someone, something,I,me,she,her or even the person!
The boxed words are a compound subject.
In a sentence talking about people, the people are subjects of that sentence. Subjects are basically what is being talked about.
Because there are two people being talked about, Bob and Al, the subjects are counted as one, or compounded. This just means that you read the sentence as [Bob and Al] instead of [Bob] and Al.
Compound verbs follow the same concept, but for action words. For example, “to sing and to dance”. However, in this case since the boxed words are subjects, they are a compound subject.
We can actually deduce here that Sexton's and Gilbert's interpretations of the Icarus myth differ from Ovid's because: A. They focus on Icarus's victory over flight instead of his eventual drowning.
<h3>What is interpretation?</h3>
Interpretation simply refers to the way something or a subject is explained to someone or to people in order to make them understand. It has to do with unveiling some hidden concepts.
We see here that from Gilbert's and Sexton's interpretations, they actually focused on Icarus victory. They didn't focus on his drowning. Gilbert said who cares that he fell back into the sea.
Learn more about interpretation on brainly.com/question/4785718
#SPJ1
