The factor that attracted immigrants and Americans to migrate from rural areas to cities was the supply of work in factories.
<h3>Why was there a migration to the cities between the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century?</h3>
Between the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century, there was a great internal migration in different countries that tended to migrate from rural areas to urban areas (cities). This phenomenon occurred mainly due to the supply of labor in the factories.
In general, from the beginning of the Industrial Revolution in the 17th century, factories became more relevant and the crafts that were done in rural areas lost relevance. Due to the above, people who lived in rural areas had to face unemployment and were forced to migrate to the cities and work in factories.
On the other hand, cities offered access to services such as education, health, public services and others that could not be easily found in rural areas. So the migrants saw in this displacement an opportunity to improve their lives.
Learn more about Industrial Revolution in: brainly.com/question/855594
#SPJ1
Answer:
The answer to your question is the Arkansas River. Hope it helps and have a wonderful day!
Answer: Ancient Rome reflects on us today in Western culture. Many governments are modeled after the Roman Republic such as law, language, architecture, engineering, and religion.
Answer:
They made africans slaves
Explanation:
they were interested in Africa because of the abundance of raw materials for industries, minerals, cheap labor and to expand their territories. T
Based on the historical concept, the reason Paine might want to use a country without a king as an example in his argument is to show that "<u>representation, and not a monarchy, is essential to good governance."</u>
<h3>Who was Thomas Paine?</h3>
Thomas Paine was a known political activist and writer during the British rule of American during the American War of Revolution.
In one of his arguments against the monarchical government and support for the Republic, he used a country without a king as an example in his argument is to show that "representation, and not a monarchy, is essential to good governance."
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that Thomas Paine supported the republic against the monarchical rule.
Learn more about Thomas Paine here: brainly.com/question/2284425
