The writer's intention with the use of a personal anecdote to introduce her argument was; Choice C;
- challenge her audience’s assumptions about wyoming residents
<h3>Use of a Personal Anecdote</h3>
Anecdotes in their simplest definition are short, amusing, thought-provoking stories and can be about a person or an event.
Personal anecdotes usually are therefore real-life stories that often happened to the writer or speaker.
Hence, she used this literary device in a bid to challenge her audience’s assumptions about wyoming residents.
Read more on personal anecdotes;
brainly.com/question/7705531
Answer: I hope this helps :)
Explanation:
Simple: Allena loves donuts Simple: Allena's brother hates donuts
Complex: Because Allena ate too manyhdonuts, she went to go workout later. Complex: Whenever the donuts go on sale, Allena makes her mom buy more
Compound-Complex: Allena's brother doesn't like donuts because they are too sweet, so he eats pizza instead.
Answer:
You'll lose the chance to practice your writing skills
Explanation:
In simple words, plagiarizing means using some other persons content of information and copying it for your own use without giving credits to the original author of the content.
Many times school and college students do that for easy win however it is most likely that they will pay penalty in future due to their low knowledge and skills. Thus, from the above we can conclude that the correct option is C.
The conflict in the short story Condensed milk is survival in a Gulag, hunger, and desperation.
Explanation:
The story follows Shestakov, a camp geologist who asks a miner to help him escape the Gulag. The miner knows the task is impossible but because he is hungry he agrees to do it in exchange for 2 cans of condensed milk.
Many prisoners attempt to escape with Shestakov but are captured and some of them are killed.
In this story, the miner walks into sure death just to have condensed milk once. The desperation and perennial hunger of the gulags pushed him to trade his life for some food that is usually a staple in normal people's lives.
This hunger and desperation is the main conflict of the story.
The movement of naturalism was greatly influenced by the 19th-century ideas of Social Darwinism, which was in turn influenced by Charles Darwin's theories on evolution. Social Darwinism applied to the human environment the evolutionary concept that natural environments alter an organism's biological makeup over time through natural selection. Social Darwinists and naturalists cited this as proof that organisms, including humans, do not have free will, but are shaped, or determined, by their environment and biology. Naturalists argued that the deterministic world is based on a series of links, each of which causes the next (for more on these causal links, see Causal links and processes, below). In "To Build a Fire," London repeatedly shows how the man does not have free will and how nature has already mapped out his fate. Indeed, both times the man has an accident, London states "it happened," as if "it" were an inevitability of nature and that the man had played no role in "it." The most important feature of this deterministic philosophy is in the amorality and lack of responsibility attached to an individual's actions (see Amorality and responsibility, below).
