1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mashutka [201]
3 years ago
12

What is the summary of the story ' The Luncheon'

English
1 answer:
VashaNatasha [74]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

"The Luncheon" by Maugham recounts a lunch he had with a woman who admired his writing. At the start, he is nervous about accepting the invitation to the fancy restaurants she proposes, but she assures him she never orders much, except, during the lunch, she orders many dishes and only eats one at a time.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
When a story is told from the _____ point of view, the narrator has full knowledge of all the characters.
gogolik [260]
The answer would be 3rd person. 
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Sir Arthur Conan Doyle know Dr. Joseph Bell?
patriot [66]
I think the answer is A, or D, have a nice day!!!
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Leader of the neo Babylonian
nasty-shy [4]
<span>El fundador del Imperio Neobabilónico, fue Nabopolasar, en el año 625 a. DO.

</span>
6 0
3 years ago
The span was so long, the height so great, and the enterprise likely to be so costly, that few thought of it as something begun
melisa1 [442]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

i did the assignment and got a 100% on edge2020

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Compose a seven to nine sentence response to the prompt: How would you compare Zimbardo’s argument that situations cause people
8_murik_8 [283]

In the first text, Zimbardo argues that people are neither "good" or "bad." Zimbardo's main claim is that the line between good and evil is movable, and that anyone can cross over under the right circumstances. He tells us that:

"That line between good and evil is permeable. Any of us can move across it....I argue that we all have the capacity for love and evil--to be Mother Theresa, to be Hitler or Saddam Hussein. It's the situation that brings that out."

Zimbardo argues that people can move across this line due to phenomena such as deindividualization, anonymity of place, dehumanization, role-playing and social modeling, moral disengagement and group conformity.

On the other hand, Nietzsche in "Morality as Anti-Nature" also argues that all men are capable of good and evil, and that evil is therefore a "natural" part of people. However, his opinion is different from Zimbardo in the sense that Nietzsche believes that judging people as "good" and "bad" is pointless because morality is anti-natural, and we have no good reason to believe that our behaviour should be modified to fit these precepts.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What statement best reflects the author’s stance on the existence of chupacabras? *
    11·1 answer
  • Write a sentence using a Noun, Adjective, Adverb, and Verb. AND use the word CONTENT
    6·1 answer
  • The primary advantages enjoyed by 16th and 17th century European sea vessels were?
    13·1 answer
  • What is the difference between relative and interrogative pronouns?
    10·2 answers
  • What's the answer ? For this multiple choice question
    14·2 answers
  • Select the correct answer.
    5·1 answer
  • 1. Which root means law, to pick, to read?
    9·1 answer
  • In a narrative essay, how can a writer give background information that cladies how the coalities?
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME
    14·1 answer
  • Write a letter to your mom.
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!