I agree it’s the last one to
False. It would be similar triangles not congruent.
Answer:
1, 2 and 5
Explanation:
A bond may be issued by the govt or a public company to raise cash for the time being and return it to the investors when the bond matures. While on the other hand, stocks are a small ownership of the company which you buy at the prevailing price in the stock market. The bonds are held for long term whereas stocks can be bought and sold within the same day. The return on bonds are stated before while stocks depend on the volatility of the stock market therefore its riskier.
Answer:
B is the Author's point of view
Explanation:
Hope this helps
The noun clause in the given sentence is an indirect object.
Explanation:
A noun clause is a dependent clause that acts as a noun and can fulfill the function of a subject, direct and indirect object, object of a preposition, or predicate nominative. Noun clauses begin with words such as <em>how, that, what, whatever, when, where, whether, which, whichever, who, whoever, whom, whomever, </em>and <em>why. </em>In the given sentence, a noun clause is <em>whomever wins the Spirit Award.</em>
An indirect object usually refers to someone or something that is affected by the action of a transitive verb, most commonly as a recipient. <em>Whomever wins the Spirit Award </em>is an indirect object of the sentence and represents the recipient (someone who will receive a scholarship).
The subject of the sentence is <em>the league. </em>As there is no preposition in the sentence, the given noun phrase can't be an object of a preposition. The predicate nominative is a noun that follows a linking verb and renames or describes the subject. Nothing like that is encountered in the sentence either. So, the correct option is<em> indirect object.</em>
Learn more about noun clauses here: brainly.com/question/2416201
#LearnWithBrainly
