The answer is option A: It makes the reader question why this unusual man has arrived.
In the excerpt from the story "The Monkey's Paw," the author creates suspense by describing Morris' appearance in detail. In this way, readers develop a feeling of uncertainty, mystery and expectation in their minds, wondering who the person is and how he will act.
I don't know if I can get three. It is important to understand that the play is actually about the supposedly irreconcilable differences between science and religion.
Two of the 3 central characters, Hornbeck and particularly Brady, are too flawed to represent well science and religion. Brady is a metaphor for all that is bad in religion. He is seen as a bigoted monster. He is overconfident and has a shallow understanding of the world. His wisdom, if he has any at all, comes from his misreading of the Bible. His understanding is further marred by his greed and his desire to win at any cost.
Hornbeck is no better. He's a walking stand up comic that moves the play along by being the comic relief. It's not part of your question so I'll just move along.
The Title itself is a metaphor for what religion can do. Jeremiah Brown is determined to undermine the truth that is at the core of the play. He goes so far in his denunciations, that even Brady can see that it is too far. Inherit the Wind comes from Proverbs 11:29 and it is well worth quoting that, because both Brown and Brady sow enough discord that they are those who will "inherit the wind." Brown actually does inherit the wind. He is left with nothing. His righteousness is barren and it has left him barren.
So here are the answers to your question.
1. Religion is seen not as Bert Cates saw it (A comfort), but as something that can lead to an inheritance of the wind.
2. Religion is seen as something shallow as seen through the eyes of Drummand when he studies Brady in the courtroom
3. Religion is seen as mindless when some of the townspeople welcome Brady.
Sorry. You get my long answer for the night. There is no easy way to answer your question.
These are some qualities of good writing:
<h3>What are qualities regarding good writing?</h3>
Qualities are attributes that someone or something has. Regarding good writing, the qualities mentioned before are what can make a difference in a piece of writing.
- If a story has variety of vocabulary, the reader can imagine the scenarios better and have a better description of the characters.
- Punctuation and grammar are also very important qualities because they keep the flow of the reading.
- Coherence is one of the most important qualities because you may stop reading a piece of writing if it does not make sense to you.
Check more information about quality regarding writing here brainly.com/question/15043694
#SPJ1
Answer: B. acknowledge an alternative perspective
Explanation:
Frank B. Kellogg and Aristide Briand were jointly awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1930 for their work in establishing the Kellogg–Briand Pact where signatories agreed to negotiate rather than resort to war to settle disputes.
In Kellogg's acceptance speech, he spoke of those who believed that a super tribunal was necessary to punish those who act against peace because he wanted to acknowledge that there were those with alternative perspectives from him on how to achieve peace.
