Answer:
The person who is honest to his work and who has strong moral principles and he follows those principles without failure.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Integrity, simply stated, is the ability to be fair in all situations. A person with integrity has strong moral values and ethics. Integrity forces a person to follow his values of honesty, loyalty and truth. Integrity also means to be complete and undivided, in both the physical and the mental stage.
When your values change from situation to situation, your integrity is lacking. A person who is having integrity is said as <em>that person who would do nothing that humiliate others.
</em>
Answer:
Correct answer is India.
Explanation:
According to the data that we have, around 80 percent of people in India are of Hindu faith, while around of 15 percent are Muslims. On the other side, there are also some religious minorities in the country, that are including Christians, Sikhism, Buddhism, Jainism and others. Most of the Hindus are living on the Indian subcontinent.
Answer:
The Caning of Charles Sumner, or the Brooks–Sumner Affair, occurred on May 22, 1856, in the United States Senate chamber, when Representative Preston Brooks, a pro-slavery Democrat from South Carolina, used a walking cane to attack Senator Charles Sumner, an abolitionist Republican from Massachusetts, in retaliation for a speech given by Sumner two days earlier in which he fiercely criticized slaveholders, including a relative of Brooks. The beating nearly killed Sumner and it contributed significantly to the country's polarization over the issue of slavery. It has been considered symbolic of the "breakdown of reasoned discourse"[1] and the use of violence that eventually led to the Civil War.
Explanation:
The nexus requirement holds that an act that is considered joint activity must have some relationship to the act of justice that the defendant is seeking to avoid.
The prosecutor must prove that the defendant acted on the basis of common sense necessary for the crime when he committed the voluntary act (or unlawful omission) necessary for the crime.
An error as to material fact may give rise to reasonable suspicion that the defendant possessed the degree of nexus requirements in the human common sense necessary to impose criminal responsibility so that such an error would be considered a lack of evidence. It is true that it is sometimes used as a defense.
Learn more about nexus requirements at
brainly.com/question/20736948
#SPJ4
Answer:
They attribute this to power struggles within the lab hierarchy.
Explanation:
In the scientific areas, research is usually carried out, and the scientists in charge of these studies that have the best reviews usually obtain better benefits than the researchers who are unnoticed. Therefore, it is essential to achieve good research results, although this often contributes to a power struggle between collaborators.
In laboratories, this struggle of power can be observed within the scientific hierarchy; this occurs among scientists with more experience, with those who have more time in the area, those who obtain better results, and those who want to achieve better benefits.
For example, in the case of anthropologists, Jona Salk observed that in some research he gave more importance to some results than others, he tried to show his power in the laboratory hierarchy and benefit some scientists.
<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>
