1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
STALIN [3.7K]
3 years ago
9

PLEASE HELP FAST!!! I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!!!

History
1 answer:
weeeeeb [17]3 years ago
3 0
Federal court case that dealt with the formation of a federal bank and a series of individual banks. The case of McCulloch v. Maryland started through a series of important events that involved a number of laws. The following laws will allow you to understand what was going on with the McCulloch v. Maryland case. 

In 1816, the United States Congress passed an Act that allowed Federal Banks to be located and to operate within individual states in the U.S. Two years later, in 1816, the state of Maryland passed an Act that placed all banks and financial institutions that operated in the state under the taxation model of Maryland. This law thus made banks and other financial institutions in the state, including all federal banks, to pay Maryland state tax. A year after the passing of this law, McCulloch v. Maryland was heard.

McCulloch v. Maryland: The Case Profile

The case of McCulloch v. Maryland was heard in 1819. The case was tried in the Supreme Court of the United States. Andrew McCulloch was the defendant in McCulloch v. Maryland. McCulloch was the appointed manager of the Federal Bank located in Baltimore, Maryland. McCulloch refused to pay the state tax imposed by Maryland; he believed that federal banks were not subject to state taxation. 

In McCulloch v. Maryland, the state was the plaintiff. The state of Maryland believed that the federal bank should pay state taxes because they were operating on their land and using their resources. 

McCulloch v. Maryland: The Verdict

The United States Supreme Court in McCulloch v. Maryland ruled in favor of the defendant, Andrew McCulloch. The United States Supreme Court in McCulloch v. Maryland ruled in favor of the defendant because the Necessary and Proper Clause of the United States Constitution stated that the Federal Government was permitted to operate banks within individual states without paying taxes. The decision in McCulloch v. Maryland created a precedent; it led to a number of future decisions involving taxation issues and the federal government. 

COMMENTS

2 comments

No related posts.

Share

RELATED ARTICLES

Roper v. Simmons

Thomas Jefferson

20% of HIV-Infected Youth were Unaware of Status

Alabama Forms

Alaska Forms

Arizona Forms

Arkansas Forms

California Forms

Colorado Forms

Connecticut Forms

District Of Columbia Forms

Delaware Forms

Florida Forms

Georgia Forms

Idaho Forms

Hawaii Forms

Illinois Forms

Indiana Forms

Iowa Forms

Kansas Forms

Kentucky Forms

Louisiana Forms

Maine Forms

Maryland Forms

Massachusetts Forms

Michigan Forms

Minnesota Forms

Mississippi Forms

Missouri Forms

Montana Forms

Nebraska Forms

Nevada Forms

New Hampshire Forms

New Jersey Forms

New Mexico Forms

New York Forms

North Carolina Forms

North Dakota Forms

Ohio Forms

Oklahoma Forms

Oregon Forms

Pennsylvania Forms

Rhode Island Forms

South Carolina Forms

South Dakota Forms

Tennessee Forms

Texas Forms

Utah Forms

Vermont Forms

Virginia Forms

Washington Forms

West Virginia Forms

Wisconsin Forms

Wyoming Forms

Alabama Codes & Statutes

Alaska Codes & Statutes

Arizona Codes & Statutes

Arkansas Codes & Statutes

California Codes & Statutes

Connecticut Codes & Statutes

Delaware Codes & Statutes

District of Columbia Codes & Statutes

Florida Codes & Statutes

Georgia Codes & Statutes

Hawaii Codes & Statutes

Idaho Codes & Statutes

Illinois Codes & Statutes

Indiana Codes & Statutes

Iowa Codes & Statutes

Kansas Codes & Statutes

Kentucky Codes & Statutes

Louisiana Codes & Statutes

Maine Codes & Statutes

Maryland Codes & Statutes

Massachusetts Codes & Statutes

Michigan Codes & Statutes

Minnesota Codes & Statutes

Mississippi Codes & Statutes

Missouri Codes & Statutes

Montana Codes & Statutes

Nebraska Codes & Statutes

Nevada Codes & Statutes

New Hampshire Codes & Statutes

New Jersey Codes & Statutes

New Mexico Codes & Statutes

New York Codes & Statutes

North Carolina Codes & Statutes

North Dakota Codes & Statutes

Ohio Codes & Statutes

Oklahoma Codes & Statutes

Oregon Codes & Statutes

Pennsylvania Codes & Statute
You might be interested in
Which of the following are types of manufacturing that are important to Canada's economy?
FromTheMoon [43]
Could you list the options?
but it will probably be timber (wood) and maple syrup
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Missouri Compromise of 1820 involved land gained from the _____ Purchase.
klio [65]
The Missouri Compromise of 1820 involved land gained from the Louisiana Purchase. The Louisiana Purchase was the purchase of land from France in 1803 that consisted of over 530 million acres.
3 0
3 years ago
The 1830 Indian Removal Act is best understood as ________.
nevsk [136]

Answer:

The 1830 Indian Removal Act is best understood as an illustration of the widespread hatred of Indians during the Age of Jackson.

Explanation:

When Jackson rose to power the situation with the American Indians was extremely tense. Just a few years before, in 1815, the country began to expand towards the west and ran into the tribes of American Indians who had inhabited the country for centuries. Those occupied lands aroused the desires of the colonies, which initiated a series of campaigns to get the Natives to travel further west in exchange for all economic royalties.

In fact, already during Jefferson's tenure (in office between 1801 and 1809) it had been established that the only natives who could stay east of the Mississippi would be those who had "civilized" and could coexist with the "white man." Based on this, those that had remained in the region were the Chicksaw, Choctaw, Creek, Seminole and Cherokee tribes. These, in exchange for maintaining their territories, had fixed their settlements, tilled the land, divided their land into private property and had adopted democracy. Some became Christian (at least in appearance) so as not to be expelled from the area.

In 1830, just one year after taking power, Jackson decided to solve the Indian problem by the brave. That is, creating a law to deport them further west. That year, the Indian Removal Act was passed, which obliged the Indians to move to lands west of the Mississippi and authorized the president of the United States to act against all those located to the east of the Mississippi river.

Officially, the politician made this decision because of the need for land to produce cotton and for "national security" (to avoid conflicts between Indians and Americans). However, in addition to these two causes and his own racism, Jackson also sought to create a human barrier between the United States and the regions under the control of other transatlantic powers. With them, Jackson not only sought to empty the Indian territories colonized west of the Mississippi Indian conflicts, but also create a security belt to the Spanish and British threat that was still installed in large North American territories.

Regardless of the cause, in practice, tens of thousands of Indians were urged to leave the houses in which they lived (their lands for centuries) to leave for "reserved" territories.

At the official level, Jackson claimed that the natives had the possibility of refusing this "relocation" and keeping their home in the United States. However, the reality was that the government (at the head of which was the president) exerted a brutal pressure on the tribal chiefs to leave. In addition, they made it clear that, in the face of the refusal, they would use force.

5 0
3 years ago
The US presidential election of 1828 was a narrow victory for Andrew Jackson. narrow victory for John Quincy Adams. landslide wi
Dima020 [189]
The presidential election of 1828 was a landslide victory for Andrew Jackson. It was actually much closer than most Presidential Elections have historically win because Jackson received 56% of the vote while Adams received 43%, but the United States of course elected President with the Electoral College. The Electoral College vote was: 178 Electoral College votes for Jackson, 83 Electoral College votes for Adams. I suppose I would consider that a bit of a landslide victory.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Check Your Understanding<br> 12. Explain D-Day and why it was important.
ycow [4]

Answer:

what is your question

Explanation:

write your questions

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are the main political ideas put forth in the declaration of independence
    5·1 answer
  • Why did leaders such as siddhartha gautama abandon hinduism to create buddhism around 500 bce?
    15·2 answers
  • Which holy city is the birthplace of mohammad, the destination of the muslim pilgrimage, and the site of the sacred stone known
    13·1 answer
  • Part A
    7·1 answer
  • Who’s the first president in 1973
    9·2 answers
  • What American sport has many parallel terminology with The Great War *
    14·1 answer
  • Which region shown on this map was controlled by Shia Muslims in 1600?<br><br> A<br> B<br> C<br> D
    7·1 answer
  • What is the outcome of the constitutional convention
    9·1 answer
  • Am the son of iapetus and brother of prometheus and atlas: husband of pandora. my name is greek for ¨hindsight¨. who am i
    11·2 answers
  • 1
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!