1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Y_Kistochka [10]
3 years ago
10

Which of the following is the best example of ancient Roman architecture?

History
2 answers:
katovenus [111]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

C is the right answer

Explanation:

A states the great wall od china wich is not roman B is giving me vibes of  America and D is the sphinx in Egypt

weeeeeb [17]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Based on the decription A seems like the Great wall of China B Sounds like a timple like structure in south or central America and D is probably the sphinx in Egypt. Also arches and domes are very Roman.  

You might be interested in
What conclusion can you draw about the location of the ships that escaped damage during the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor ?
ELEN [110]

Explanation:

Promptly in the first part of the day on December 7, in excess of 350 Japanese planes assaulted around 33 American ships on requests of Bad habit Naval commander Chuichi Nagumo. America supported lost about 170 airplane devastated and 160 harmed that morning, just as three boats obliterated and 16 harmed. 3,000 700 Americans lost their lives, including 68 regular citizens. The expense to the Japanese was 29 airplane, five diminutive person submarines, and 130 assistance work force, everything except one of whom was executed in real life.

4 0
3 years ago
A _____ is usually controlled by a state.
Sonja [21]

Answer:

is there answer choices?

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do you think the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was worth it? Why or why not?
Vlada [557]
This is a matter of opinion.  Do YOU think the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was worth it?  Let's look at the factors.

What were some of the positives?  Well, firstly, it ended World War II.  That's kind of a big deal.  In fact, it caused Japan not only to surrender, but UNCONDITIONALLY surrender.  Basically, that means the US could ask Japan to do whatever it liked--which the US liked!  Secondly, it was a triumph of science.  The atomic bomb was a revolutionary work of science.  Nothing like it had ever been made before, and it was all based on secrecy and theoretical science.  The atomic bomb also <span>provided the basis for new, improved weapons, including the hydrogen bomb.  </span>Thirdly, it helped establish the United States as a world power.  Knowing about this super powerful weapon the US had, countries were likely to back off!  

But there's a lot of negatives here, too.  Keep in mind that most of these benefits were for the United States alone.  Of course, there was one other BIG negative for the United States, and that's cost.  The atomic bomb was worth billions of dollars!  A second big one wasn't so much for the United States as for the world, especially Japan.  When the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, the effects on the people and city were devastating.  People were vaporized.  Cities and buildings were flattened, and nothing is left but carnage.  People died, their skin peeling off, from cancer and radiation.  It was awful!  Thirdly, it caused the arms race.  Knowing the US had this super weapon, ALL the countries started building their own.  Now, we pretty much live in fear of all the nuclear weapons there are today--which are hundreds of times more powerful each than the first bomb!

So what do you think?  Was it worth it?
6 0
4 years ago
Sixth Amendment
Simora [160]
It is either c or a but I think it is c
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Effects if splitting the Roman Empire?
maria [59]

Answer:

Splitting the Roman empire into two parts however did not work. Rome was now easily attacked by military invaders. Rome also could not fight well. They had to hire mercenaries to fight for them. This was not the best plan because mercenaries are not always loyal to the country that they are fighting for. Rome also faced political turmoil. The government was now very oppressive which lost them the support of the Roman people. Rome also faced economic weakness, due to very high taxes. Rome also relied more heavily on slaves not the technology that they had developed and used before. The final problem that faced Rome was the social decay. Romans no longer held the key values of the Roman culture like patriotism, discipline, and devotion to duty and the upper class was too dedicated to luxury and prestige.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did humanism contradict medieval attitudes towards Christianity?
    11·1 answer
  • During the battle of britain germany switched from bombing raf targets to what new target
    7·1 answer
  • What country was attacked in 2001 sparking nato to work together
    15·1 answer
  • 2. Why do you think Trade created cultural diffusion?
    6·1 answer
  • The United States decided to try to build a canal across Panama instead of Nicaragua because?
    8·2 answers
  • A lobbyist's job includes
    15·1 answer
  • Whats 2 ways that President Jackson challenge the status quo
    14·2 answers
  • How Martin and ceasar Chavez are different​
    14·1 answer
  • How important was George Washingtons role in designing the government of the United States. Give 2 or 3 examples of his influenc
    14·1 answer
  • Which statements about the Cold War are true?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!