<span> He was a Spanish explorer and conquistador who led the first European </span>expedition<span> deep into the territory of the modern-day United States (Florida, Georgia, Mississippi</span>
Violence never really deals with the basic evil of the situation. Violence may murder the murderer, but it doesn’t murder murder. Violence may murder the liar, but it doesn’t murder lie; it doesn’t establish truth. Violence may even murder the dishonest man, but it doesn’t murder dishonesty. Violence may go to the point of murdering the hater, but it doesn’t murder hate. It may increase hate. It is always a descending spiral leading nowhere. This is the ultimate weakness of violence: It multiplies evil and violence in the universe. It doesn’t solve any problems.
Answer:
B) "Seeing the look in their eyes, their gestures, facial expressions, and body language provide additional cues to their meaning."
Explanation:
The questions is asking specifically about a passage that would support the importance of nonverbal cues. Answer A doesn't reference non-verbal cues, and neither does C. Answer D does reference non-verbal cues, but answer B is better because it talks about communication, not just connection.
Nullification is where a state has a right to disagree with a federal law they think is unconstitutional and not correct, and no longer abide by it. Nullification would have weakened the Union because states would no longer have to agree or act on certain laws, causing obvious conflict within the state and conflict between Congress and the state. The state would no longer be unified and a quarrel between people in the state, the states, and between the state and the Congress would deepen and would most likely lead to war and weaken the Union.
I believe they had a plane with cameras that tools pictures and they saw in on there
