1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Scorpion4ik [409]
3 years ago
8

Three-Fifths Compromise

History
1 answer:
Mashcka [7]3 years ago
3 0

<u><em>The order of the information is the following: </em></u>

<u><em> </em></u>Three-Fifths Compromise

Major players: Southern states vs. Northern states  

Major issue Slaves used to determine representation  

Resolution One slave = 3/5 person  

        Connecticut Compromise

Major players: Large states vs. small states  

Equal vote for all vs. population based  

A House and Senate, one representing all states equally, and one representing based on population  

The Connecticut Compromise was a solution that took into account the project presented by the populous State of Virginia and the project submitted by the less populous State of New Jersey.

The plan of Virginia proposed that the Representatives of each State before the Congress of the Nation would be chosen according to the amount of population; while the New Jersey plan proposed that each State had an equal number of Representatives.

The solution determined in Connecticut consisted in creating two legislative chambers: The House of Representatives whose members would be chosen according to the population of each State; and the Senate whose members would be in equal amount for each State.


The Three-fifths Commitment was a compromise between several positions in the negotiation carried out by the Southern States that supported slavery and the States of the North that were against slavery.

The States of the South initially requested that slaves be taken into account when choosing the Representatives before the Federal Congress; while the Northern States demanded that only free citizens be counted. It entered into the discussion if the slaves would be counted at the time of paying the taxes on the part of the States to the Federal government.

The solution that closed the negotiation was to count the slaves but to assert them as a ratio of 3/5. That is, each slave was equivalent to 1 free citizen at the time of adding Representatives of each State before the Federal Congress.


You might be interested in
Nmae two states/regions that were at a disadvantage due to industrialization.
Sauron [17]

Answer:

United States & Europe

Explanation:

Industrialization was known as a global event which drastically effected a variety of countries and many states within those countries. During this time period, in the mid 17th to late 18th century, workers were working 6 days a week for approximately 12 hours a day. This caused many workers to become overworked; additionally many homes and families resided in cities that were overcrowded, placing many at risk for a variety of the outbreak of diseases and other bacterial infections. It was quite unsanitary really. However, not only that, many countries also used fossil fuels such as coal to create a energy source that became very popular, which additionally polluted the atmosphere with CO2 emissions within the past century. This mostly had an effect upon the US and Europe due to a high population and intense dependability on fossil fuels and a variety of machinery works.

Fun Fact: These two countries were the first to get involved within industrialization even before Great Britain and even China.

5 0
3 years ago
Uzupełnij kartę pracy i wklej do zeszytu: 1.Uzupełnij zdania: Kryzys gospodarczy po zakończeniu I wojny światowej spowodował, że
posledela

translate it also to English

6 0
4 years ago
Concept of human rights
zvonat [6]

Human rights are at the core of international law and international relations. They represent basic values common to all cultures, and must be respected by countries worldwide. Human rights are inalienable fundamental rights to which a person is inherently entitled simply because he or she is a human being.

5 0
4 years ago
Let's Check In
maksim [4K]

Answer:

<em>C. The goverment places fewer restrictions on business.</em>

<u><em>Hope this helps!</em></u>

<u><em>Please mark brainliest!</em></u>

5 0
3 years ago
Plz plz plz plz plz plz plz helppppppp plzzzzzzzzzzz
melomori [17]

Answer:

the government was corrupt.

Explanation:back in the old days the government only cared obout them selves and not others.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • As Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, John Marshall: was a strong Federalist and nationalist supported a relative
    11·2 answers
  • 15 points help
    8·1 answer
  • Were the rich of the 1830s really exploiting the workers, or were they providing them with job opportunities? Would you rather h
    9·1 answer
  • How did the Aztecs use trade to increase their economy
    12·2 answers
  • . Establishment of the first English Parliament gave the people
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following contributed to a resurgence of conservatism in the late 1970s through the 1980s?
    14·2 answers
  • Atomic bomb was dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Iwo Jima C. Tokyo b. Nagasaki d. Okinawa a. Please select the be
    8·1 answer
  • What was NAFTA? What was this agreements intention and purpose? Why was there so much disagreement on if NAFTA should be passed?
    11·1 answer
  • What led up to the battle/how did the battle of Long Island start?
    7·1 answer
  • Which is true about parents and their offspring?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!