1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Oxana [17]
4 years ago
9

In 1960 two thirds of the 69 people killed during peaceful anti apartheid march were shot in the back what does this suggest hap

pened
History
1 answer:
Anuta_ua [19.1K]4 years ago
4 0
Government targeted protesters 

If protesters were shot in the back, that suggests they were not shot in self-defense or in a confrontation but rather as they ran away or were being peaceful. 

This evidence could support that the protesters were massacred by the government through the police forces. Being shot in the back suggests it was peaceful and protesters were not fighting back when shot. 
You might be interested in
Which statement correctly contrasts an initiative and a referendum in Michigan
vekshin1
Hi it would be incorrect
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What effects did the arrival of Europeans have on Native Americans? (1 point)
sammy [17]
The answer is b. conquest and diseases brought by Europeans changed the native American way of life forever.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
(Please help :) !! )What was a result of the Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison?
Reika [66]

Answer:

The Supreme Court gained the power to declare laws unconstitutional.

Explanation:

This is called Judicial Review.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Match each term with its correct definition or description
lesya [120]
Where’s the terms? :)
5 0
3 years ago
Why was the pardon of Nixon controversial
Sonja [21]
When Gerald Ford issued Proclamation 4311 (the document in which gave Richard Nixon full and unconditional pardon), he was excused from any crimes he may commit against the United States while president. This was controversial because there was nothing stopping Nixon from committing treason against the United States. People believe the law should apply to everybody equally no matter what the standards nor what position/title you hold. The other side of the argument is that because he's the President of the United States and holds all this power, he's "untouchable" in a sense, and/or doesn't deserve to be held by the same law that every other citizen is under.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • HELP ME PLEASEEE ITS TIMED !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    5·1 answer
  • What where the effects Panic of 1873 on the US economy?
    15·1 answer
  • How did the styles and techniques of the Itlian Renaissance spread to the North?
    7·1 answer
  • What did liberals believe about european states in the early 19th century?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following was one way that the french revolution differed from the american revolution
    7·1 answer
  • Which type of economy merges free-market ideas with government regulation.
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following lists countries in Europe?
    8·2 answers
  • What is the uniqueness of the monarchical system of government in a kingdom​
    11·1 answer
  • 10 points pls be fr ty
    8·2 answers
  • 5
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!