Answer:
The samurai, members of a powerful military caste in feudal Japan, began as provincial warriors before rising to power in the 12th century with the beginning of the country’s first military dictatorship, known as the shogunate. As servants of the daimyos, or great lords, the samurai backed up the authority of the shogun and gave him power over the mikado (emperor). The samurai would dominate Japanese government and society until the Meiji Restoration of 1868 led to the abolition of the feudal system. Despite being deprived of their traditional privileges, many of the samurai would enter the elite ranks of politics and industry in modern Japan. More importantly, the traditional samurai code of honor, discipline and morality known as bushido–or “the way of the warrior”–was revived and made the basic code of conduct for much of Japanese society.
Early Samurai
During the Heian Period (794-1185), the samurai were the armed supporters of wealthy landowners–many of whom left the imperial court to seek their own fortunes after being shut out of power by the powerful Fujiwara clan. The word “samurai” roughly translates to “those who serve.” (Another, more general word for a warrior is “bushi,” from which bushido is derived; this word lacks the connotations of service to a master.)
Explanation:
<span>The correct option is a. Iraq denounced the events and
disassociated itself from al-Qaeda</span>
Iraq did not come out to condemn the events of September
9/11, However, world leaders condemned the action and promised to stand with
the United States. The President also responded decisively through the use of
military force to avenge the attack
Answer:
The answer is C, an escaped slave who served in the American Army.
Explanation: Jehu Grant was a slave in Narragansett, Rhode Island. He ran away in 1777 and served in the continental army for eight months.
Which of the following best describes what a thesis for a historical essay should be?
a) a well-researched fact
b) a summary of an event
c) an interpretive claim
d) an uncontestable statement
The best answer is an interpretive claim
in my list C
Copied first answer
I believe it was when small and large States decided to have an upper and Lower house. the lower house, house of rep, was to have the number of rep. be based on population. while the upper house, the senate, was made to give all states an equal representation in the government. this being based on statehood ,which earned two senators, and did not take population into account into choosing the number of senators.
