Answer:
1808.
Explanation:
<em>"There is a sense in which the Clause is no longer constitutionally relevant since it expired in 1808. At the time the Constitution was adopted, there was no guarantee whether or when the federal Congress would act to prohibit the importation of slaves. So there is a legitimate inquiry about what took place in the political realm over the 20-year period between the adoption of the Constitution and 1808. During that time period, popular support for the abolition of the slave trade and slavery itself increased both in the United States and in other countries. There was more support for restricting the slave trade initially than slavery itself in this time period. In the 1790s, Congress passed statutes regulating the trade in slaves by U.S. ships on the high seas. The United Kingdom and other countries also passed legislation restricting the slave trade, increasing international pressure on the United States to likewise curb the practice."</em>
<em />
<em />
Source: constitutioncenter.org
Confucious is the philosopher
Answer:
In a confederate system of government, the majority of political power is based on the local government, while the central government has very little power. Local government has the power to act as they wish, which can cause conflicts between states and the central government.
The Confederation represents an alliance between states, reinforced by a common ruling body that has no higher central authority that would give the Confederacy a mark of sovereignty. The Confederation does not have any of the three state governments (legislative, executive, judicial).
Explanation:
The implementation of decisions is made unanimously (which carries a risk of inefficiency) and depends on the will of the member states because they implement decisions.
The Confederation, as a legal relationship between states, has neither a central authority, nor its territory, nor its population. The states sign an international treaty, not a constitution, so member states have both a veto right and a secession right. Therefore, the confederation cannot be even considered as a state, but rather an enhanced form of the alliance between states.
This was because the rich owners of the factories and other places of work has a lot of sway in the government, while the people whom they hired were often very young (child labor was completely unregulated) and virtually none of the workers had an education. This coupled with harsh punishments for disobedience and failing to meet quota meant many lived in fear of their superiors. All of these factors came together to result in few wanting to try and rest out of fear of harsh punishment or simply getting replaced by one of the thousands of desperate people looking for work, that and with nobody knowing how to read or write rallies were difficult to pull together without passing through word of mouth, if you've ever played telephone then you know how reliable that is. There's the shortest answer I could come up with. I hope this helps.