<em>Would a prediction be accurate if the person about to act becomes aware of the prediction prior to the act itself? </em>
This is a classic problem of the deterministic approach to action. If psychology was perfect, it is likely that this would enable psychologists to predict how a person is going to act in any situation. It would also make psychologists able to predict when this act would take place. However, for such a prediction to be useful, the psychologist would have to keep this information from the subject. Otherwise, the knowledge of the prediction could potentially make the person act in a different way, rendering the prediction obsolete.
<em>Does the fact that a prediction can be known in advance disprove the possibility of predicting accurately or is that fact just one more antecedent condition? </em>
The fact that a prediction can be known in advance does disprove the possibility of predicting accurately. The moment a prediction is made, the prediction alters the state of the components that were necessary to know in order to make a prediction. Therefore, the prediction becomes obsolete as the action might or might not happen in the way that was previously predicted.
Nadine gordimers use of fairy tale genre conveys modern themes in once upon a child ,Gordimer means that there can be a clean hero, a clean villain, and in all likelihood a satisfied ending.
<h3>What is the fantasy of the Nadine gordimers ?</h3>
It's extra of a dystopian fantasy - with overtones of the racial inequality in Gordimer's local South Africa.Gordimer skilled the apartheid device in South Africa firsthand and uses "Once Upon a Time" to specific the concern and tension she and others felt in the course of that violent period.
She desires to have interaction with the readers' preconceptions of testimonies that start with “Once Upon a Time” in order that the plot of her tale is more shocking.
Read more about the Nadine gordimers:
brainly.com/question/11192656
#SPJ2
