Answer:
Option A, The officer did not have a reasonable suspicion that the item was a weapon; bad frisk
Explanation:
The options for the question are -
a) The officer did not have reasonable suspicion that the item was a weapon; bad frisk.
b) The officer had reasonable suspicion that the item was evidence of a crime; good frisk
c) The officer had reasonable suspicion that the item was a weapon; good frisk
d) The officer was conducting a pat down for officer safety; good frisk
Solution -
When an officer is able to judge correctly that the suspect is a dangerous individual and may be carrying a weapon, then he/she undergo reasonable suspicion. In most of the case an officer presumption is right but in this case the presumption about the suspect carrying a weapon was wrong. Usually such presumptions are based on circumstances. Reasonable suspicion allows a police officer to inspect the suspect.