(Please help?) What comparison describes the difference between the founding principles of the Black Panther Party and the Natio
nal Urban League? nonviolent community action v. nonviolent labor movement civil rights through protest v. civil rights through courts community self-defense v. economic self-reliance Black Power v. Black nationalism
The correct answer is "community self-defense v. economic self-reliance".
The <em>Black Panther Party</em> was a political organization founded in October 1996. It implemented a common practice of constituting "armed" citizens patrol to monitor the activities of police officers while they were on duty in order to prevent acts of use of excessive force against African Americans. They instituted various social programs which offered direct aid to the African American American Communities.
On the other hand, the <em>National Urban League</em> was a nonpartisan civil rights organization founded in 1910 that sought equality of rights among all citizens in the United States. They eventually achieved many improvements towards this objective through their actions in courts.
Both were black nationalist groups but the difference is that the Black Panther Party (BPP) were a more right-winged extremist group compared to the National Urban League (NUL) when it came to the two political/social activist parties. Basically the BPP were willing to break the law to achieve their demands, while the NUL did it via the system with more progressive tactics. Or, less violent at the least.
On the 6th and the 7th of November 1917 (<em>or 24 and 25 October on the Julian calendar, this is why the incident has often been referred to as the October Revolution</em>).
Socialist revolutionaries headed by leader of the Bolshevik Party, Vladimir Lenin, launched an almost bloodless coup d'état against the provisional government of the Duma.
The main reason why ethnic tensions became such a severe problem in the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia is because the the USSR was such a vast territory that it forced many people who had not gotten along for centuries under the same political umbrella.
The relationship between the French and the Native Americans was way more cordial than the relationship between the British and the Native Americans. The French were interested in establishing trade posts instead of permanent settlements like the British did, so they did not displaced the Native people
