Which best describes why this is an example of inductive reasoning? It starts with details and uses them to support a more sweep
ing statement. It makes an assertion, then counters arguments against that assertion. It defends an argument with carefully researched facts and excerpts. It uses an anecdote to support a broad claim about the injustices of slavery.
The answer that <span>best </span><span>describes why this is an example of inductive reasoning is A. It starts with details and uses them to support a more sweeping statement.</span>
The term "inductive reasoning" refers to the reasoning which gives specific information, taking into account that it does not contain an accurate conclusion. So the best example of inductive reasoning is "It starts with details and uses them to support a more sweeping statement".
