When variables are precisely measured and characterized, the study has External Validity.
<u>External Relevance</u>
- The degree to which you may extrapolate a study's findings to different persons, groups, environments, and measurement scales is known as external validity. Can you, in other words, extrapolate the research's conclusions to a wider context.
- The goal of scientific study is to generate information that can be applied to the actual world.
<h3><u>Why is external validity important? What is it?</u></h3>
- Can the study be applicable to the "real world"? is a question that external validity aids in answering.
- External validity is strong if your study is transferable to different trials, environments, subjects, and eras. External validity is low if the research cannot be repeated in different contexts.
To learn more about External Validity, Click the links.
brainly.com/question/9292757
brainly.com/question/13897140
#SPJ4
I believe the answer is: comorbid
A disorder is considered to be 'comorbid' if it could co-occuring with another type of disorder. Comorbid is a very common occurrence in mental disorders and the interaction that happen between these different disorders could make each condition become significantly worse
I think the answer is c but not for sure
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be "Charles de Gaulle".
Explanation:
Charles de Gaulle, the leader of France, might not have been accompanied to the Yalta Conference and Stalin offered to have included France in Germany's post-war government unless France's invasion zone had been separated from either the United States and British territories.
This was agreed at the Yalta Conference that German would be separated into four occupation areas. It has also been determined that after Nazi Germany's defeat the Soviet Union would strike Japan.
Therefore, it's the right answer.
Answer:
philosopher Sam Harris
Neuroscientist and philosopher Sam Harris argues that free will is an illusion