1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
HACTEHA [7]
3 years ago
5

Why was it important to find communist in the US during the 1950s

History
2 answers:
White raven [17]3 years ago
7 0

During the McCarthy era, hundreds of Americans were accused of being communists or communist sympathizers; they became the subject of aggressive investigations and questioning before government or private industry panels, committees and agencies.


emmainna [20.7K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Americans in the 1950s were afraid of communism for two primary reasons. First, communism appeared to be on the rise worldwide, becoming more popular and powerful. Second, because communism was an ideology, many Americans feared it would invade their country and turn citizens toward capitalism and democracy.

Explanation:

By the 1950s communism seemed to be gathering momentum all over the world. The Soviet Union detonated its first atomic bomb in 1949, showing that it could cope militarily with the US. The Chinese Communists defeated non-communist forces in their civil war the same year. In 1950 Communist North Korea invaded South Korea, leading to the Korean War, which lasted until 1953 and came to include both China and North Korea. In areas as distant as Greece and French Indochina, there were communist insurgencies. All these things encouraged the Americans to think communism was growing and becoming more powerful.

Simultaneously, communism was terrifying because it was an ideology that could theoretically appeal to people from any country. The US has never clashed for an ideology before. Nazism was more of an ideology, but it was very unique to Germany and ultimately did not last long. In comparison, communism clearly claimed to be a fundamental philosophy which could appeal to all. Because of that, Americans could worry about communism infecting their country. It would come in through sympathizers of the communists who would subvert American ideals and mislead the American people. Ultimately, if those people were not stopped, they would turn America into a communist country. Since communism could sneak up on us, and because it seemed to gain influence all over the world, in the 1950s Americans hated communism.

You might be interested in
What was the main effect of the contract with america?
4vir4ik [10]
<span>What was the main effect of the contract with america (Republicans took control of Congress)</span>
4 0
4 years ago
why is it so difficult for historians to arrive at aninterpretation of past events that is universally accepted
Levart [38]

History is a social science that studies past social and political events. As a discipline, it uses a methodology in order to study historical facts. Facts are objective for every Historian, but when Historians interpret the same facts often they arrive at different conclusions. That is because interpretation is highly subjective and the only way to interpret facts is through some specific perspective, a point of view or paradigm. When Historians interpret some period of History using a theoretical framework, they look at History like looking through glasses that enhance some factors in detriment of others. And that is inevitable when doing the historical interpretation.

Take, for example, Vladimir Lenin and the rise of the Soviet Union. According to Marxism, it was the forces of a social class, the workers, that rose against the imperial Russian state and the bourgeoisie that led to the creation of a Communist state. There are several historical documents that back this point of view. But according to Intentionalism, it was the powerful and attractive personality of Lenin and his talent for politics which led to the fall of the empire and the establishment of a new political system. Again, this is also very well-documented.

Of course, there can also be many other interpretations for this fact. For any historical event, there are many alternate interpretations, each of which looks at different -and many times contradicting- factors of History.


8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain the strengths of the Articles of Confederation and how people reacted to this document.
dimulka [17.4K]

Answer: The strengths of the Articles of Confederation were:

The first constitution

Congress had the power to deal with foreign affairs, declare war, make peace and sign treaties.

It had the power to manage Native Indian affairs.

It could pass laws that could affect all the states.

Could coin money

It had passed the Northwest Ordinance of 1787; it formed new states that had a population of 60,000 or more

It had control of the Department of Postal Service

Explanation: However, as most of us should already know, the Articles of Confederation was revised later and then the U.S Constitution was  ratified.

8 0
3 years ago
Is it A-B-C-D <br> History
Evgen [1.6K]
C I believe hope this helps :) have a good day
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
After his father died took over the task of establishing a colony in Texas
trasher [3.6K]

Answer: It is most likely Stephen Fuller Austin

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was Britain’s role in the French Revolution?
    7·1 answer
  • Why have debates become more consistent since 1987?
    10·1 answer
  • The first war of the Cold War era
    9·1 answer
  • Please help with this!!!!!! Why do you think it is protected now from mining and logging?
    13·1 answer
  • During the late 1800s, the idea of Social Darwinism was used to explain the
    6·1 answer
  • Why was the first national government of the United States called a Confederation?
    11·2 answers
  • Describe ONE reason why European trading companies “became an inevitable part of the politics and economy of South India” and ot
    10·1 answer
  • Please help! Will mark brainliest
    5·1 answer
  • You have identified ways the historical figure was a great leader in the past. And you’ve examined some characteristics of great
    7·1 answer
  • Nations from Central Europe and Eastern Europe are part of the European Union.
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!