Answer:
No, it does not.
Explanation: Same-sex couples do not truly threaten heterosexual marriages and families because they are just like the rest of society. They are just people in love like heterosexual people and their love doesn't affect anyone. Two men or two women being married doesn't stop a heterosexual couple from having kids or getting married, does it?
Answer:
C
Explanation:
And for the second question need more info
The best answer in that set would seem to be "compromise." I'm not sure I'd use exactly that term, but it's the best term from the set of answers given. Count Camillo di Cavour was prime minister of the Kingdom of Sardinia, serving under King Victor Emmanuel II. This was a time in history (in the 19th century) when prime ministers were starting to exercise more control of policy than the kings themselves. It was also a time of something that came to be known a "Realpolitik" (a German term), or "realistic politics." So I'd say Cavour was a political realist who chose paths of action that would benefit his overall aims, whether or not they fit some specific ideology or master plan. I suppose "compromise" would be another way of saying that, but I'd prefer to say he practiced political realism.
The correct answer is:
It made the economy weaker.
The 1920s saw the growth of Installment Plans, meaning buying on credit. This was started by General Motors to increase sales by way of the auto loan. But the easy credit created a dramatic rise in consumer debt, together with a heavy decline in consumer savings. This would be disastrous to the economy in the 1929 economic crisis.
Man you will get no where wwithout no statements
