Answer:
Pashtun code of conduct for women is different than the code of conduct for women for the rest of the world. In Pashtun families the women are generally not educated and are mostly kept at home this mindset was annoying Malala however Malala was getting her school education, after the incident Malala left the country and got her further education. Malala's friends after the incident being traumatized for life continued their education in the same school.
Explanation:
Pashtun code of conduct for women is different than the code of conduct for women for the rest of the world. In Pashtun families the women are generally not educated and are mostly kept at home this mindset was annoying Malala however Malala was getting her school education, after the incident Malala left the country and got her further education. Malala's friends after the incident being traumatized for life continued their education in the same school.
Answer:
C) they can't make their payments.
Explanation:
Makes the most sense.
Answer:
First one is correct second one I am unsure sorry
Explanation:
A satire on the social beliefs and the economic conditions of Europe at the time
The reasoning that Machiavelli uses in this passage is: Machiavelli uses deductive reasoning by first introducing the conclusion that new rulers must be cruel and then supporting it with evidence.
Deductive reasoning is a form of reasoning where broad generalizations are first made before specific observations are used to corroborate it.
In the passage, we see an example of deductive reasoning because a broad generalization about the cruelty of leaders was first made before examples were used to support it.
Learn more about deductive reasoning here:
brainly.com/question/7284582
