Part A:
The number of outcomes that each of them will have to choose anyone at random is calculated below.
n = 3 x 3 = 9
This is because, Al will have 3 choices and similarly, Bill will also have three choices. These outcomes are as written below.
S = (1,1), (1,2), (1,3), (2, 1), (2,2), (2, 3), (3, 1), (3, 2), and (3,3)
Part B: To make the same choice, there will only be three outcomes. These are:
S = (1, 1), (2, 2) and (3, 3)
Part C: If neither of them will vote for 2, there will only be four outcomes. This is because each of them will only have two choices. These are:
S = (1, 1), (1, 3), (3, 1), and (3,3)
Answer:
A.grow through innovation
When the first question is asked. Up until then you could decide to walk away.
Answer:
pay a wage rate less than labor's MRP
Explanation:
A monopsonistic employer in an unorganized (nonunion) labor market will: "pay a wage rate less than labor's MRP"
The above statement is based on the idea that Monopsony is a market situation whereby a single buyer or firm is the only purchaser of a good or service, which in most cases has to do with the purchase of labor.
And given the fact that the firm is the sole purchaser of labor, where there is no labor union, there is a high tendency that such firm or employer pays a wage rate less than labor's marginal revenue productivity.
Answer: 21%
Explanation: The developer purchased 3 properties and he can buy each property for $20 per square foot.
Therefore: 75 × 110 =8250 square feet.
8250 × $20 = $165 000 per lot.
Each lot was sold for $200 000. Which means the developer made profits of:
$200 000 - $165 000 = $35 000 per lot.
The percentage of profit on each lot is:
Percentage of profit on cost amount:
= 
= 0.2121212 recurring × 100
= 21,21%
Percentage of profit on sale amount:
= 
= 0.175 × 100
= 17,5%