The main reason that would make a country to end its participation in a war because it has become immoral is the presence of war crimes.
<h3>What are War Crimes?</h3>
This refers to the inhumane actions that a person or soldier, usually fighting in a foreign country metes out on people, such as unprovoked aggression, extra-judicial killings, genocide, etc
Hence, we can see that the presence of war crimes is the main reason why a country would pull out of a war and claims it is immoral as this would have infringed on human rights.
Read more about war crimes here:
brainly.com/question/1550237
#SPJ1
Base on the questions, the possible answers to you following questions, base on my research and further investigation, would be the following:
#1 <span> D. cruel and unusual punishment.</span>
#2 <span>D. create clear standards to be applied fairly before imposing the death penalty.
I hope you are satisfied with my answer and feel free to ask for more if you have question and further clarification</span>
Written Laws are more valuable than spoken laws because you have it written, you have it on paper,. You that persons writing and if anyone goes against it you have it on paper, not the witness of that person saying it. You have proof.
Answer:
Plymouth
Explanation:
In November of 1622, Squanto arranged a trading expedition for a group of new colonists living near Plymouth to a Native-American settlement called Monomoy, near what is now modern day Pleasant Bay. The local tribe there met peacefully with the colonists and awarded them corn and beans.
Answer:
'Dog eat dog' is an innane phrase generally used by inarticulate people. The certain individual who coined the phrase was most likely unaware of or simply ignorant of the unwavering fraternity held between members of the species canis familiars.
Explanation:
It's a dog-eat-dog world and variants, in fact, echo an earlier proverb that comes all the way from Latin.
