Answer: Each country had its own agenda about the post-war world.
Context/explanation:
Churchill in particular, along with Roosevelt, pushed strongly for Stalin to allow free elections to take place in the nations of Europe after the war. At that time Stalin agreed, but there was a strong feeling by the other leaders that he might renege on that promise. The Soviets never did allow those free elections to occur. Later, Winston Churchill wrote, "Our hopeful assumptions were soon to be falsified." Stalin and the Soviets felt they needed the Eastern European nations as satellites to protect their own interests. So one key point of disagreement between Stalin and the other two was over the direction things would take in Eastern Europe after the war.
While Winston Churchill and Franklin Delano Roosevelt were on the same page in many ways, there were also key differences between them. As noted by The Churchill Project of Hillsdale College, "FDR, ever the optimist, believed (or wanted to believe) that Stalin could be convinced that the West was not committed to destruction of the Soviet regime." Churchill had a much more skeptical view of Stalin and the Soviet Union and approached the relationship in a firmer fashion. Roosevelt had hoped to continue cooperation with the USSR. That changed under Truman, who took over the US Presidency after FDR's death. Truman was strongly anti-communist in his stance.
Another difference between Roosevelt and Churchill pertained to colonialism and imperialism. Again as noted by The Churchill Project: "Over colonialism. Roosevelt firmly believed European colonialism had been a major cause of World War I, and that it had continued to be a source of international disputes and tensions before World War II. Churchill had sworn defend the realm, which, when he took office, included the British Empire." As it happened, after World War II, colonialism's days were numbered and independence movements broke out around the world where imperial powers had dominated.
Answer:
B. nationalism.
Explanation:
The nationalism that originated in the times of the French Revolution changed over the years. By the beginning of the 20th century, most European peoples identified with a nation state and were willing to defend or go for interests of a homeland.
The nationalism fueled competition over economic, social aspects, and was best explained by the rivarly between the French and the Germans.
Prussian -French war caused the tensions to increase among the former.
The rivalry was also felt between the English and the Germans over the seas. The increased trade and foreign trade also was a important force that brought tensions in other continents.
The concept of Nationalism emerged to the most, in the military propagandas, and the racial and ethnic policies from the Central `powers.
<em>A fierce state of things promoted a national army in numbers that were unprecedent to the times- and the war effort ultimately was propeled by nationalistic groups that prevailed among societies.</em>
I think it’s B you’re welcome
Answer: Freedom of speech
Explanation:
The First Amendment in the Constitution of the United States helps in the protection of the freedom of religion, the freedom of speech, religion and also that of the press.
The First Amendment that's violated in the above case is the freedom of speech. People have the right to freedom of speech and no one should arrest others based on their speech or take such rights away from them.
