I gonna have to say C. Foxes are often times seen or thought of as sly and shrewd falls between those lines
Two sections from the text that best support the answer to Part A are:
E. "So in the last 10 years and the hope for the future, we've seen the beginnings of a science of positive psychology, a science of what makes life worth living." ( Paragraph 17)
F. "But once you fractionate happiness the way I do — not just positive emotion, that's not nearly enough — there's flow in life, and there's meaning in life." ( Paragraph 37).
<h3>What is the main claim of the text?</h3>
In the text, the Psychologist shows that happy lives can be classified in three ways, namely; the pleasant, engaging, and meaningful lives.
This classification is supported by the sentences above because they talk about positive psychology which discusses a meaningful life.
Sentence F elaborates on the three kinds of happiness that form the main claim of the text.
Learn more about psychology here:
brainly.com/question/12011520
Answer:
When the thunderstorms resume, the children regret their actions. Their change of perspective conveys the theme regarding the importance of exercising tolerance towards others.
Explanation:
This might help but if not then I don't know sorry.
Answer:
B. clever
Explanation:
In his famous speech from 1852, later named "What to A Slave is The Fourth of July" Douglass uses this special date to express his views on the position of slaves in America at the time.
Comparing the fight of the Americans for their independance and against unjust treatment by the British to the situation of black community in the USA some seventy years later, he asks for understanding and support in the pursuit of those same values Americans fought for in the Revolution.
He also uses this argument to criticize respect of this values (freedom and rights) by white US citizens, while, at the same time restraining black people for obtaining them, using well chosen words and clever arguments to emphasize this hypocrisy.
Hello. Unfortunately, you did not present the speeches to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for me to answer you. However, I will try to help you as much as possible.
The only way to answer this question is to read both articles completely and understand the arguments and opinions presented by the authors. After doing these readings, you should identify the text that was most significant to you. It is likely that this is the text that you agree with the author's arguments, or that managed to provoke a strong reflection in you. Once you've identified this, you should look for which part of this text that made an impact on you and managed to make you choose it. This part is the text element that was meaningful to you.
