Answer:
does not need a required rate to calculate
is the rate at which npv is zero
Explanation:
Internal rate of return is an example of capital budgeting method
Internal rate of return is the discount rate that equates the after-tax cash flows from an investment to the amount invested.
Projects with the IRR greater than the discount rate should be accepted. It means that it is profitable.
Projects with more than one negative cash flow are unsuitable for calculating with IRR. This is because it can lead to multiple IRR, Thus, it not suitable for analysing all investment scenarios.
The net present value is the most preferred capital budgeting method
Other capital budgeting methods includes
1. profitability index = 1 + (NPV / Initial investment)
2. Accounting rate of return = Average net income / Average book value
3. Payback calculates the amount of time it takes to recover the amount invested in a project from it cumulative cash flows
4. Net present value is the present value of after-tax cash flows from an investment less the amount invested.
Answer: 7.35%
Explanation:
Based on the information given, the market rate of return on this stock will be calculated as:
= (D1/P0) +G
where,
D1= Dividend at year 1 = 2.20
P = price at present =43.19
G = dividend growth rate =2.25%
We then slot the figures into the formula and we will get:
= (D1/P0) +G
= (2.20 / 43.19) + 2.25%
= 0.051 + 2.25%
= 5.1% + 2.25%
= 7.35%
Therefore, the market rate of return will be 7.35%.
Answer and Explanation:
The journal entry is shown below:
Bad debts expense Dr $60,000
To Accounts receivable $60,000
(Being the written off amount is recorded)
For recording this we debited the bad debt expense as it increased the expenses and credited the account receivable as it reduced the assets
So for correcting posting and recording we passed accurate entry
Answer:
$8.31 million and No.
Explanation:
In this question, we have to find out the present value which is shown below:
= $1 + first year value ÷ ( 1 + discount rate) + second year value ÷ ( 1 + discount rate) ^ number of years + third year value ÷ ( 1 + discount rate) ^ number of years
= $1 + $2 million ÷ (1 + 10%) + ($3 million ÷ 1.10)^2 + ($4 million ÷ 1.10)^3
= $1 million + $1.82 million + $2.48 million + $3.01 million
= $8.31 million
No the package would not worth $10 million as its present value is $8.31 million
Answer:
sunk cost
Explanation:
Sunk cost is cost that has already been incurred and it cannot be recovered. When making future decisions, sunk cost should not be considered.
The money i paid for the ticket is the sunk cost. I should not consider this cost when making the decision of whether to for the concert or not to
