Answer:
100%
Step-by-step explanation:
Let p = percent of cashews in first mix
2p = lb. of cashews in first mix
30(.20) = 6 = lb. of cashews in second mix
32(.25) = 8 = lb. of cashews in the combined mix
So,
lb. of cashews in first mix + lb. of cashews in second mix = lb. of cashews in the combined mix
2p + 6 = 8
2p = 2
p = 1 = 100%
Answer:
There is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 1432
p = 23% = 0.23
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of theft complaints , x = 321
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.298
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Answer:
48
Step-by-step explanation:
6 flowerpots
8 flowers per pot
8 x 6 = 48 flowers
-2n(5 + n - 8 - 3n)
-10n - 2n² + 16n + 6n²
4n² + 6n