this is true because that is also a right of the people
Main ideas are basically two words. One main subject and one main verb.
Answer:
The San master trackers he filmed demonstrated the skills required to track an animal in the wild. If Craig Foster could just have picked out an octopus who wasn't his teacher, all would have been well.
Explanation:
Answer:
Impossible to say <u>(READ THE EXPLANATION)</u>
Explanation:
It is incredibly hard to say what would’ve/wouldn’t have happened for events that have passed. I imagine that they still would’ve lost (US would’ve caught up and far exceeded eventually). The Battle of the Atlantic would have been different. Although the British did develop radar first, the Germans used it far better and far more often than the Allies did. Actually, the Germans used a more advanced radar system that the allies didn‘t come up woth till perhaps the end of the war. The long and short of it is the same would’ve happens because the Germans used it better and more often than the Allies until about 1944.
Answer: It is relevant and sufficient, because she gives convincing examples of how phones support classwork.
Explanation:
Parvati's argument in favor of using cell phones in class is valid and sufficient. The evidence she presents is strong - she claims that cell phones are useful research tools that enable us to find the right piece of information. She also provides specific examples and even explains a situation in her class where cell phones were used. This makes her argument convincing, because she supports her claim with solid evidence.
