1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
anygoal [31]
3 years ago
10

When an amendment is proposed, who determines the method of ratification?

History
2 answers:
Llana [10]3 years ago
8 0
The states and the congress. If a constitutional amendment is going to be ratified, first it has to get votes of support from 2/3 of both the house of representatives and the senate, after which it goes on voting in individual states, and if 3/4 of states ratify it then it becomes an official amendment of the constitution.
True [87]3 years ago
4 0

There are two ways to change the Constitution: in the congressional proposal and the state convention method. Congressional proposal method requires two-thirds of the two chambers of Congress must propose amendments, whereas the state convention method requires two-thirds of the states must ask Congress to hold the convention.

 

EXPLANATION

Article V is an article explaining the constitutional amendment process, but the Framers intended that the amendment process is not easy: although the federal government can also add amendments, three-quarters of states must ratify each amendment.

Congress has proposed 27 amendments to the United States Constitution. 26 of them have been passed by three-quarters of the state legislature. The remaining amendments were ratified by three-quarters of the state conventions.

Whereas in the state convention method, two-thirds of the states must ask Congress to hold the convention. Then an amendment will be proposed at this meeting. As in the method of a congressional proposal, the proposed amendment must then be ratified by three-quarters of the state conventions or the state legislature, as chosen by Congress. However, the state convention method has never been used to amend.

LEARN MORE

If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:

• Federalists and Anti-federalists agreed on ratification of the Constitution

brainly.com/question/535163

KEYWORD: ratification, constitution, congress

Subject: History

Class: 10-12

Subchapter: amendment  

You might be interested in
Homes in the Nile delta were made out of wood. (True/False)
Sphinxa [80]

The answer is true the homes in the Nile delta were made out of wood.


4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was President Johnson elated after the Senate's vote on the eleventh article of
yulyashka [42]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

On May 16, 1868, US President Andrew Jhonson was elated after the US Senate had acquitted him during his impeachment trial. After the vote, 35 senators voted guilty and 19, not guilty on the 11th article on impeachment.

This made President Jhonson to me more confident that 10 days later, on May 26, 1868, the Senate would again favor him And so it was. The votes were identical. 35 senators voted guilty and 19, not guilty on the 2nd article of impeachment.

The reaction of the radical Republicans was one of anger for the decision made in Congress. Let's remember that Radical Republicans always had major differences with President Johnson in different areas, such as the way to order Reconstruction in the southern states.

4 0
3 years ago
Before being named___, a person cannot have served in the military for the<br>previous 10 years.​
pashok25 [27]

Answer:

The Secretary of Defense

Explanation:

This has already been asked.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How could the English bill of rights lead to political revolution
Rudiy27
The English Bill of Rights has had a long-lasting impact on the role of government in England. ... The act limited the power of the monarchy, but it also bolstered the rights and liberties of individual citizens. Without the English Bill of Rights, the role of the monarchy might be much different than it is today.
7 0
3 years ago
In Schenck v. United States (1919), the Supreme Court decided that a "clear and present danger" to the country allowed the feder
galina1969 [7]

Answer:

b. Restrict first amendment rights.

Explanation:

The Schenck v. United States (1919) Supreme Court case ruled by putting limitations on the rights of individuals if it concerns the interest of the nation. This ruling states that constitutional rights are not absolute and can be changed anytime the government sees fit.

The Supreme Court decided to issue the limits on the freedoms of individuals, especially during wartime. This ruling established the ability of the government in suppressing any speech or news that it thinks is harmful to the welfare of the nation. It stated that with concerns regarding the <em>"clear and present danger" </em>that can put the nation in jeopardy, the government is free to restrict the first amendment rights as and when it feels necessary.

Thus, the correct answer is option b.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Atticus argues that people abuse the thomas jefferson quote all men are created equal explain
    9·1 answer
  • The new deal increased the scope of both national and state powers by ______. giving the states more control over how federal po
    11·1 answer
  • Which sentence best explains the effect of the Pax Mongolica on regions under Mongol control?
    13·2 answers
  • In what ways did joseph mccarthy violate american values in his search for communists?​
    8·1 answer
  • Why did the europeans look down upon the indians​
    6·1 answer
  • What is Aphrodite brith and infancy (as a baby)
    10·1 answer
  • What was the name of the belief system that considered wealth to be a measure of fitness
    10·2 answers
  • Babylonia boasts of many cultural achievements, many of which are still relevant today. For which of the following were they NOT
    14·1 answer
  • Because ___________ lost his Supreme Court nomination while being outspoken about his beliefs, nominees for the Supreme Court no
    15·1 answer
  • How did the military recruit most of the 4 million Americans who served during World War 1?
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!