Answer:
I'm not sure about this one but i honestly think.
He feels like the wolves howl in diffrent places and they can hear it.
OR
He feels annoyed by the wolves howling.
Explanation:
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
It seems there is no question here. It is a statement. Probably, it is a true or false question, but you do not mention it. So we can help with a general answer like this.
More than believing that the anti-federalists believed in a loose construction of the constitution, what these people thought was that a strong central government was bot good for the new nation.
We are talking about the debates during the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in 1787. During the convention, federalists and antifederalists debated about the form of government for the United States. Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton and John Jay, believed in a strong central government. Antifederlaits, led by Thomas Jefferson, opposed to a strong federal government because it could turn into a tyranny. But when James Madison drafted the US Bill of Rights, antifederalists accepted the new Constitution.
Strengths: High personality, scientific eminence, curiosity,knowledge,persistence, kind,creative, loves to read, hardworking. like to share discoveries - which basically made him a teacher.
Weakness: Suffers from memory Loss
A well-know saying is "Nothing is as well amazing to be true"
Disasters began turning unnatural again in the 1970s, when researchers’ attention shifted away from physical hazards and toward the vulnerability of people and communities .Nature remains full of hazards, but only some of them wreak disaster. It is human-built structures, not the shaking ground, that kill when an earthquake strikes; people live, often out of desperation, in low-lying slums where flooding is a certainty; well-intentioned forest managers fuel bigger fires; evacuation systems fail; nuclear plants are built along risky coasts; and devastated communities either get help to survive and recover, or they don’t.
There’s another reason that the “natural disaster” label has long outlived its expiration date. It’s really about blame—deflecting it, dissipating it, or removing it from the equation completely. But unfortunately for the blameworthy, science is learning more every year about how human activity is contributing not only to natural-looking disasters but even to the fluxes of air, earth, and water that inflict the destruction. This didn’t start with greenhouse emissions, but it may end there. Climate disruption has collapsed the last walls between the human and the natural—and the storms are growing.
Hopes this helps in some sort of fashion :)
나는 공부하고 있습니다.
Hope this helps,
