1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nataly_w [17]
3 years ago
9

The mean income per person in the United States is $50,000, and the distribution of incomes follows a normal distribution. A ran

dom sample of 10 residents of Wilmington, Delaware, had a mean of $60,000 with a standard deviation of $10,000. At the 0.05 level of significance, is that enough evidence to conclude that residents of Wilmington, Delaware, have more income than the national average
Mathematics
1 answer:
sergij07 [2.7K]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Yes. There is sufficient eveidence to support  the claim that Wilmington resident's earn more than the national average

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the following;

\alpha=Significance \ Level=0.05\\n=10\\\bar X=60000\\\ s=sample\  \sigma=10000

#We set our hypothesis as:

H_o:\mu\leq 50000\\H_a:\mu>50000

The rejection region of either hypothesis:

P(t>t_o)=0.05, we determine the critical values for this probability in the T distribution table;

t=1.833

=>We reject for all values greater than 1.833, t>1.833.

#We now determine the value of the test statistic as:

t=\frac{\bar X-\mu_o}{s/\sqrt{n}}\\\\=\frac{60000-50000}{10000/\sqrt{10}}\\\\=3.1623

We find that:

t=3.1623>1.833,\ \ \ Reject \ H_o

Hence, there is sufficient eveidence to support  the claim that Wilmington resident's earn more than the national average.

You might be interested in
Q3. If I = (P × R × T)/100, find T if I = 80 Rs, P = 400 Rs., R = 10 Rs. (2)
sukhopar [10]

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  T = 2

Step-by-step explanation:

Fill in the given numbers and solve for T.

  I = PRT/100

  80 = 400·10·T/100

  80 = 40T . . . . . . . . . . . . simplify

  80/40 = T = 2 . . . . . . . . divide by the coefficient of T

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In pathagrean theorem if c is 17 and b is 15 what is a
Scorpion4ik [409]

Answer: a = 8

Step-by-step explanation:

use the equation a^2 + b^2 = c^2

c = 17, b = 15

a^2 + 15^2 = 17^2

a^2 + 225 = 289

a^2 = 64

a = 8

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which is the graph of f(x) = –(x + 3)(x + 1)
Sergio [31]

Answer: Please refer to the attachment below

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
in class, matthew stated "i think that a negative is like an opposite. That is why multiplying a negative times a negative equal
sveticcg [70]
Yes and no. A negative number and it's opposite are 'integers.' Yes, a negative and a negative multiplied together give you a positive. The two negative signs cancel out making it positive. But no, a positive and a positive multiplied together do not give you a negative. When you subtract positive numbers you can get a negative, but not when multiplying. If you were to do a positive times a negative it would be negative because the positive can't cancel it out. Example: -3 · -3 = 9. [] 3 · 3 = 9. [] -3 · 3 = -9. Other than the positive number part, the statement is true about the negatives. I hope that helped!
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the answer??????
dexar [7]

Answer:

38 5/28

Step-by-step explanation:

Well start with the whole numbers 24 and 13 This is adding so that means everything has to be added together. 13+24=37 Now, lets go the fractions.

Find the LCD (Least Common Denominator)  of 3/4 and 3/7 and rewrite to solve with the equivalent fractions. (remember the Denominator is the BOTTOM PART of the Fraction. Such as the 4 in 3/4.)  

LCD = 28

21/28 + 12/28 = 33/28 which can be simplified to 1 5/28. Combining the whole and fraction parts 37 + 1 + 5/28 = 38 5/28 And that will be your answer. Another way you can do this is

converting mixed numbers to fractions Meaning put them in improper form where the numerator (the top number of a fraction is bigger than the denominator such as 4/3) , our initial equation becomes, 99/4 + 94/7

Applying the fractions formula for addition,

(99×7) + (94×4) / 4×7

= 693+376 / 28 =  

= 1069/ 28

Simplifying 1069/28, the answer is

= 38 5/28

And one more thing. An easier way to make a mixed number a improper fraction is the multiply the denominator by the whole number then add the numerator and whatever the denominator is it stays for example

38 5/28.

28 times 38 = 1064 then add the 5 and you get 1069! But we aren't done yet, the denominator was 28 so that means the full answer is 1069/28 and that is the Improper fraction form!

Hope this helps! (sorry I took so long)

~R.C aka dj

 

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Before she went on a diet, Jenna’s waist measured 32.45 inches.After the diet, it measured 26.97 inches.How many inches did Jenn
    6·2 answers
  • I need help.....Which values are possible lengths for segments AC and CD, respectively?
    11·2 answers
  • Calculate 15% of £28.00
    6·1 answer
  • At the lowest price for jeans, consumers will demand the _____ jeans, and producers supply the _____ jeans.
    5·2 answers
  • Consider the series ∑n=1∞158n ∑n=1∞158n determine whether the series converges, and if it converges, determine its value. conver
    12·1 answer
  • 60,000 ones equals how many thousands
    15·1 answer
  • Choose Yes or No to tell whether each number is rational.
    7·1 answer
  • Help fast please!!! <br> Find the values of x and y.
    9·2 answers
  • Ulian pays $120 for soccer shoes that are on sale for 20% off from a specialty store. At a discount store, the same shoes cost $
    15·1 answer
  • Need help please its a missing assignment and i need to turn it in at midnight
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!