All categories

3 years ago

How did the Lend-Lease Act and the Atlantic Charter change U.S. involvement in World War II?

History

2 answers:

OLga [1]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

The Lend-Lease Act and the Atlantic Charter Act ended the "pretension" of US neutrality in the face of war.

Explanation:

Lend-Lease was the program through which the United States of America provided on loan to the United Kingdom, the Soviet Union, China, Free France and other allied nations, arms and other supplies, between 1941 and 1945. The program was signed into law on March 11, 1941, a year and a half after the outbreak of World War II in Europe, but nine months before the US entered the war in December 1941. Formally entitled "An Act to Promote even more the United States Defense, "the law ended the "pretension" of neutrality of the United States. A total of $ 50.1 billion worth of supplies were sent: $ 31.4 billion to Britain, $ 11.3 billion to the Soviet Union, $ 3.2 billion to France, and $ $ 1.6 billion for China. Under the terms of the agreement, the material could be used by these nations without payment until the time of their return or destruction. After the program closure date, material that had not been destroyed was sold to Britain at a discount as long-term loans from the United States.
The Atlantic Charter was the first relevant document that preceded the United Nations. It resulted from the meeting of US President Franklin D. Roosevelt with British Prime Minister Winston Churchill in August 1941 during the difficult relations that permeated World War II. It was approved by the statesmen on August 14, 1941.

dusya [7]3 years ago

4 0

<span>the Lend-Lease Act was the principal means for providing U.S. military aid to foreign nations during World War II</span>

You might be interested in

Why was the Battle of Gettysburg a turning point in the Civil War?

xxTIMURxx [149]

The Battle of Gettysburg fought on July 1–3, 1863, was the turning point of the Civil War for one main reason: Robert E. Lee's plan to invade the North and force an immediate end to the war failed. ... The collision of two great armies at Gettysburg put an end to that audacious plan.

5 0

3 years ago

We will be studying the achievements of ancient Egypt’s rulers during the New Kingdom. Write one to two sentences predicting wha

UkoKoshka [18]

Sample Response: I think we are going to learn how the New Kingdom pharaohs conquered other countries. I think we are also going to learn how they built great cities.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Identify three reasons why George Washington was NOT a fan of political parties.

lutik1710 [3]

Answer:

George Washington, in his entire life, did not represent any political party.

Explanation:

George Washington elected as head of the Continental Army and he also became the first President of the United States.

When he became the President, there were no political parties in America.

Washington was not a fan of any political parties as he believed it divided people of a country based on ideas which may harm and destroy the young nation. He only wanted to be the President of all the citizens in America. Political parties first began in his first term in office.

He believed in unity because it was the only reason to keep a democratic republic survive. He stated that the country could survive and function without the existence of political parties.

7 0

3 years ago

The magna carta removed some power from the bardons. true or false

Alja [10]

My Answer: False. I chose this because the magna carta removed power from the<span> king and gave some rights and freedom to the people. </span>

Hope I helped! :D

3 0

3 years ago

Imagine that you were President Ford when he was trying to decide whether to pardon Nixon. Use the table below to list the pros

UNO [17]

Some of the pros for pardoning Nixon by President Ford include:

It would put the Watergate Scandal to rest.
It would further expose to government to scrutiny which might lead to a loss of public trust.

Some of the cons for pardoning Nixon were:

It would be an unpopular move that would cost Ford support.
Nixon would have escaped justice.

<h3>What were pros and cons of pardoning Nixon?</h3>

If Nixon was pardoned, it would have the benefit of putting the Watergate Scandal to rest. This was important because the issue was polarizing the nation.

Taking a former president to trial would have also led to the people losing confidence in the position of the President which would have been very negative.

On the other hand, Nixon had committed a crime and should be punished like everyone else and pardoning him would mean he would escape this justice. Most people were also against a pardon at the time.

Find out more on the Pardon of Nixon at brainly.com/question/312947.

3 0

2 years ago