1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
3241004551 [841]
3 years ago
12

Many of the early settlers in Australia would MOST likely have been?

History
2 answers:
Aleks04 [339]3 years ago
8 0

the answer is c also i took the test on USA test prep hope it helps

DIA [1.3K]3 years ago
3 0
Many of the early settlers in Australia would most likely have been "<span>C) forced into jobs involving physical labor," since in fact the British settled this area as a penal colony. </span>
You might be interested in
Under the protestant church of england, who was the head of the church? a. the pope b. the bishop c. the monarch d. none of the
Sedaia [141]

Answer:

C: Monarch

Explanation:

Under the Church of England also known as the Anglican Church the head of the church was the monarch in power. Anglicanism was started by King Henry VIII (8th) of England so he could divorce his then wife Catherine of Aragon.

The current head of the Anglican Church is Queen Elizabeth II of the UK.

4 0
2 years ago
[50 POINTS!!] HELP What is 1 or more George Washington polices used today?
liberstina [14]

Answer:

On December 6, 1790, the United States Capital officially moved from New York City to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The capital remained in Philadelphia until 1800 when it permanently settled in Washington, D.C.

The United States government spent its first year (1789-1790) under the Constitution in the city of New York. During much of the preceding confederation period (1776-1787), however, Congress had resided in Philadelphia. Upon the formation of a new national government under the Constitution, the city campaigned vigorously for the federal government to return. While Congress chose to establish the nation's capital along the Potomac River in the District of Columbia, it also rewarded Philadelphia; it chose the Pennsylvania city to house the federal government until 1800 while its offices in Washington were under construction.

Arriving in time for the December 1790 session, Congress moved into Philadelphia's county courthouse, Congress Hall. These quarters quickly proved too small, and in 1793 the building had to be enlarged. The Supreme Court met in the mayor's courtroom in Philadelphia's city hall, and President George Washington moved into the former home of a local politician. As part of its improvement program, Pennsylvania offered to build Washington a presidential mansion. Washington, however, feared the city would use the residence in a bid to keep the capital in Philadelphia permanently. He also worried that living in grandeur would send the wrong message to Americans and the world about the nature of the new American republic. When Pennsylvania built the mansion anyway, Washington refused to live in it.

The initial adjustment period proved somewhat chaotic as legislators searched for housing in a city rapidly filling with tailors, barbers, shoemakers, and other entrepreneurs who hoped to capitalize on the presence of the federal government. Prices rose accordingly with the increased demand for goods and services, and many congressmen bemoaned the higher cost of living. The profusion of balls, dinners, dances, public lectures, musical performances, and theater spurred by the federal presence created a rich cultural environment. President Washington's weekly reception for politicians and foreign diplomats and Martha Washington's Friday evening soirées commanded the highest priority in the city's social scene. Washington's careful cultivation of public esteem and deference in Philadelphia enhanced his image as a national symbol and fostered the growth of American nationalism. In an era when most Americans looked to Congress as the primary branch of government, Washington's public persona in Philadelphia helped to elevate the stature of the presidency and solidify its importance in the American political system.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
(MC)Which phrase summarizes the question before the Supreme Court in Brown v. Board of Education (1954)?
expeople1 [14]
Hello

Here something for help you to answer and for help you later may be.


Racial segregation in the public schools is unconstitutional, as a violation of the equal protection cause . Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka , 347 U.S 483 was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court declared state laws establishing separated public schools for black and white students to be unconstitutional. The decision overturned the Plessy v. Ferguson decision of 1896, which allowed state-sponsored segregation , insofar as it applied to public education. Handed down on may 17, 1954, The Warren Court’s unanimous decision stated that " separate educational facilities are inherently unequal " As a result, de jure racial segregation was ruled a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of The Fourteenth Amendment of The United States Constitution. This ruling paved the way for integration and was a major victory of the Civil Rights Movement, and a model for many future impact litigation cases.
However, the decision’s fourteen pages did not spell out any sort of method for ending racial segregation in schools , and the Court’s second decision in Brown II, 349 U.S 249 only ordered states to desegregate " with all deliberate speed "


Bye and don’t forget I’m proud of you!<33
3 0
3 years ago
The President of America famously pardons a turkey every year. Can you locate in the find a word the turkey pardoned by Barack O
uranmaximum [27]

<span>These were the names of turkeys which was pardoned by the Barack Obama. This was back in the year 2016 on the thanks giving eve. After that these turkeys was sent towards the gobbler rest in the black burg where they was take care. Pardon of turkey is the tradition in which <span>president</span></span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Sobre o mito do rei Midas, o que ele significa? Ou seja, o que aprendemos com o mito? Ou ainda melhor, o que o mito busca explic
kykrilka [37]
Midas era un hombre que deseaba que todo lo que tocaba se convertiría en oro. Sin embargo , no había pensado que este deseo no era en realidad una bendición , sino una maldición . Su avaricia nos invita a pensar y darse cuenta de las consecuencias que nos pueden llevar a convertirse en esclavos de nuestros propios deseos .
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is a consequence of emperor theodosius updating the roman law code in 438?
    10·1 answer
  • What do you think the architecture of the Supreme Court says about the institution?
    5·2 answers
  • I will give you BRAINLIEST!!!!
    12·2 answers
  • What word is used in jamestown to describe men who had money and power?
    12·1 answer
  • Help On this !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    5·2 answers
  • Why is sunny days better than snowy days?
    14·1 answer
  • Explain the interaction of the early african farmers and the Khoisan people.
    14·1 answer
  • What statement best describes why Napoleon chose to invade Russia?
    9·1 answer
  • What is Uncle Iroh's favorite tea from Avatar the Last Airbender?<br> :)
    8·2 answers
  • Answer the following question based on the example URL below. Please note, you do not need to view the site to answer this quest
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!