1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Fed [463]
3 years ago
13

Mark the consequence if it is intentional. A. Europeans take corn to Africa. Corn becomes an important crop there. B. Some sailo

rs and conquistadors have smallpox. They come in contact with Native Americans who contract the disease and die after infecting their relatives and neighbors. C. Affluent Europeans buy sugar from merchants in European cities. Millions of people in Africa are kidnapped by African slave traders and sold to European sugarcane planters in the Caribbean.
History
1 answer:
Maurinko [17]3 years ago
7 0
The one option that describes an intentional action would be "E<span>uropeans take corn to Africa. Corn becomes an important crop there," since the Europeans needed a sustainable crop for survival and profit. </span>
You might be interested in
How did the GI Bill of Rights contribute to the post–World War II economic boom?
Elena-2011 [213]

Answer:

It helped veterans acquire the skills needed to rejoin the civilian workforce

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does Madison like acknowledge about criticism of existing governments
tekilochka [14]
I am also having same problem .....................................................................
5 0
2 years ago
The number of enslaved people who were freed because of the Emancipation Proclamation increased gradually over time. Why do you
Inga [223]

Answer:

because the word spread

8 0
3 years ago
Which is NOT a component of capitalism?
Alekssandra [29.7K]
Not being able to own private property isnt a component. Since capitalism is being able to own a private property.
4 0
3 years ago
How did the British gain, consolidate, and maintain power in India?
Semenov [28]

Answer:

Around 1670, King Charles II of England gave the British East India Company rights to run their territories in India as they saw fit. He gave them the power to mint money, command fortresses and troops, form alliances, make war and peace, and to enforce laws in the areas they controlled.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in this case that a suspect's confession could not be entered as evidence unless he was first read
    11·1 answer
  • Why do people revolt against their government??
    9·2 answers
  • Which is one difference between government agencies and government corporations?
    6·1 answer
  • Identify the origin of North Americans and the causes of early migration from Asia
    8·1 answer
  • Did the virginia plan give too much power to the national government?
    6·1 answer
  • The working people of France were called the
    12·2 answers
  • Which group in Hawaii was in favor of annexation by the United States?
    9·2 answers
  • A Religious Refuge in Utah
    8·1 answer
  • When did starbucks reserve roastery open in chicago
    10·1 answer
  • Which best describes how advertising influences consumer choice in an oligopoly?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!