B.
Public opinion was very much against Hoover
The answer is the Klu Klux Klan. They still are active today, but not as much. Hope this helped! Good luck!
Globalization must be expected to influence the distribution of income as well as its level. So far as the distribution of income between countries is concerned, standard theory would lead one to expect that all countries will benefit. Economists have long preached that trade is mutually beneficial, and most of us believe that the experience of widespread growth alongside rapidly growing trade in the postwar period serves to substantiate that. Similarly most FDI goes where a multinational has intellectual capital that can contribute something to the local economy, and is therefore likely to be mutually beneficial to investor and recipient. And a flow of capital that finances a real investment is again likely to benefit both parties, since the yield on the investment is expected to be higher than the rate of interest the borrower has to pay, while that rate of interest is also likely to be higher than the lender could expect at home since otherwise there would have been no incentive to send it abroad. Loose talk about free trade making the rich countries richer and poor countries poorer finds no support in economic analysis.
Because the French gave their support to a different tribe during the war.
On one hand, people consider bureaucracies as necessary administrative instruments that will ensure an orderly management of an organization.
On the other hand, bureaucracies are also believed to be the source of inefficiency in organizations. Which leads to a low perception of quality in the services they provide.
It is a matter of finding an adequate point between a swift service and good controlling tools. Even if this point is found, it demands constant revisions, as the reality of the environment which an organization serves changes with time.
