I believe a lot depends on how "traditional" is defined, given there are numerous traditions.
But to put them all together in diverse creation tales ranging from Genesis to the Silmarilion... Also, keep in mind that a myth isn't always true... It's a lyrical way of expressing something we don't understand... maybe the genuine answer is simply boring.
Such hypotheses provide a solution to everything... The Creator(s) did it this way, so accept it.... but they don't tell you anything, such as that annoying bit about fossils.... What method did they use to get through the rock that was buried deep beneath... and seashells... I'm not sure
how they made it to the mountain tops.
Christians are quick to criticize other creation accounts, but not a literal interpretation of Genesis. For those who insist on following a literal Genesis creation, the explanation provided by Evolution is far more elegant.
A - the citizens elect people to represent them in government.
In a republic the power is held by the people or who they elect - not a monarch (king) or small group of people, or even parole.
The answer is A-Winslow Homer
Answer:
<h2>Limited government</h2>
The 10th Amendment puts limits on the powers of the federal government, which was a goal of the Constitution overall. The 10th Amendment reserves powers for the states (and for the people themselves) any powers not specifically designated to the federal government in the United States Constitution. Any laws and powers exercised by the states still must be in accord with what is stated in the US Constitution, however.
For some historical context, we might also consider that the original framers of the US Constitution thoughts that statements such as the 10th Amendment -- and all of the first 10 Amendments, known as the Bill of Rights -- were already inherent in the Constitution as it was written. They had composed a constitution that intentionally placed limits on the federal government. So, stating such a limit in an amendment seemed like a repetition of what was already apparent in the Constitution itself. As noted by the National Constitution Center, "The Constitution’s Framers thought that a bill of rights was appropriate for an unlimited government, but not for a limited one like the national government created by the Constitution. The Constitution accordingly sought to secure liberty through enumerations of powers to the government rather than through enumerations of rights to the people."
Nevertheless, to assure those who wanted the rights of the people specifically listed and protected, Amendments 1 through 10 were added to the Constitution as a Bill of Rights to affirm those protections.