Not sure but hope what I know help a little...Slavery was “an unqualified evil to the negro, the white man, and the State,” said Abraham Lincoln in the 1850s. Yet in his first inaugural address, Lincoln declared that he had “no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with slavery in the States where it exists.” He reiterated this pledge in his first message to Congress on July 4, 1861, when the Civil War was three months old.<span>Did You Know?When it took effect in January 1863, the Emancipation Proclamation freed 3.1 million of the nation's 4 million slaves.</span>
What explains this apparent inconsistency in Lincoln’s statements? And how did he get from his pledge not to interfere with slavery to a decision a year later to issue an emancipation proclamation? The answers lie in the Constitution and in the course of the Civil War. As an individual, Lincoln hated slavery. As a Republican, he wished to exclude it from the territories as the first step to putting the institution “in the course of ultimate extinction.”
Answer:
its good
Explanation:
this is because if there was no communism nobody could understand each other
Answer:
Of course, it is fear that it stems from. For example, the west believes that, islamization of the region would draw them back to centuries and application of archaic laws based on the teachings of the Koran. Like women covering their hairs, not driving and not having their own opinion in public space.
On the other hand, the Middle East believes that, the westernization of their region would lead to them losing their culture, traditions and values which has been on the teachings of their religion and the Koran applications.
Explanation:
C or d would be the answer
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
The average American was excited by the election of Andrew Jackson in 1828 after he had lost the 1924 presidential election against John Quincy Adams.
Many issues in the federal government combined with the personality of Jackson, allowed Andrew Jackson a victory in the electoral college 178-83.
The election was marked by a new form of doing political campaigns in which the advocates of both candidates organized festivities, rallies, and other promotional events to support the candidates. During the campaigns, the candidates exchanged hard words and slander.
The bipartisan system had initiated when Adam's followers identified themselves as Republicans and Jackson's followers as Democrats.
