The importance is that Saul didn’t do his purpose of what he was supposed to do.
1. We were weeding the vegetable bed and picking ripe tomatoes is the correct sentencing of the fragment.
2. It would be the third one "my brother was careful to avoid driving during rush hour" because this is a sentence and in the first choice makes the fragment turn into two fragments.
3. Add "turn" to the beginning of the fragment. This makes the fragment into a sentence.
Answer:
He didn't actually do the crime. What testimony does Detective Karyl give about fingerprints? There were not any clear ones.
Explanation:
hmu if you need more help
The line of dialogue which most seems to contribute to reader's understanding of Dave's character is "How could I have asked for a more rewarding evening?"
<h3>What does the line reveal?</h3>
The line of dialogue "How could I have asked for a more rewarding evening?" reveals a few things about Dave's character:
- He will do something he does not enjoy if there is a reward involved.
- He has a sarcastic quality to his personality.
- He is focused on the future.
That is why option 1 seems to be the best answer. Both options 2 and 3 basically review that Dave is methodical. Option 1, however, shows all those traits he has.
Learn more about character here:
brainly.com/question/8864308
#SPJ1
What unit and lesson is this? I may have completed it already
