As a result of lava that has cooled
The Cold War asked the question in which the general public as well as the government decided where to draw the line in between a person and their own personal freedom & <em>personal space</em>, and the general public's safety. The Cold War saw extensive usage of spies and espionage, as well as counter-espionage tactics that included surveillance, counter wire-tapping, etc. With the government listening to almost everything a citizen says, it took away the sense of privacy. The trend is seen even today, where the US government's past record & capability to continue surveillance of the general public makes many wonder whether or not they really have "freedom".
~
The argument made by Holmes was that the protection of free speech is important but there are some cases in which personal expression is irresponsible and can be banned.
<h3>What is the case of Schenck v. United States?</h3>
The Court determined that a state could constitutionally limit an individual's free speech rights under the First Amendment.
Hence, the Justice of the state made an argument that the the protection of free speech is important but there are some cases in which personal expression is irresponsible and can be banned.
Therefore, the Option C is correct.
Read more about Schenck v. United States
<em>brainly.com/question/2764676</em>
#SPJ1
Answer:
C its government is controlled by ayatollah.
Theocracy means that religious people rule the country in the name of God
I do agree that freedom is linked to economic opportunity as well as physical security and freedom. Without freedom, security is somewhat useless. Freedom comes in two forms, economic freedom and social freedom. Therefore in America and other democratic states, you have the freedom to do both. In a capitalistic society, one has to get a job to make money which is a freedom that guarantees economic opportunities hence guaranteeing security. Security, on the other hand, comes in two different forms: First, financial security and physical security however one does need these securities to guarantee their freedom because freedom is already there considering one lives in a democratic, and capitalistic state. It is the job of a capitalistically residing individual to ensure that he uses that freedom to guarantee security.
