Answer:
A) acid rain
Explanation:
Plz mark me as a brainliest
Options :
a. the popularity of Domino's Pizza in Italy
b. the preference for local hamburgers from a local chain, Jollibee's, in Philippines
c. the growing number of McDonald's restaurants globally
d. the increased sales of soups and noodles in Thailand
e. popularity of Chinese foods in Taiwan
Answer: c. the growing number of McDonald's restaurants globally
Explanation: Cultural dictation in the preference of food refers to an individual's inclination to the type of food usually adopted or consumed in one's region. This is usually natural since these type of diets are what is being consumed from a very tender age. However, as development and growth occurs, people get know about other food types, dietary and nutritional benefits of various food types, thus allowing individuals to make choices based on nutritional Dividends one may derive from the consumption of certain diets. People are starting to opt for diets or food containing more nutritional and healthier supplements supplements. One of the evidences could be derived when there is a surge in the number of foreign kitchens in regions where it doesn't exist before. The surge could be termed to mean that demand for these diets are starting to converge. Such as the global increase in the number of McDonald's restaurants.
When Jesus reached the famous well at Shechem and asked a Samaritan woman for a drink, she replied full of surprise: "Jews do not associate with Samaritans” (John 4:9). In the ancient world, relations between Jews and Samaritans were indeed strained. Josephus reports a number of unpleasant events: Samaritans harass Jewish pilgrims traveling through Samaria between Galilee and Judea, Samaritans scatter human bones in the Jerusalem sanctuary, and Jews in turn burn down Samaritan villages. The very notion of “the good Samaritan” (Luke 10:25-37) only makes sense in a context in which Samaritans were viewed with suspicion and hostility by Jews in and around Jerusalem.
It is difficult to know when the enmity first arose in history—or for that matter, when Jews and Samaritans started seeing themselves (and each other) as separate communities. For at least some Jews during the Second Temple period, 2Kgs 17:24-41 may have explained Samaritan identity: they were descendants of pagan tribes settled by the Assyrians in the former <span>northern kingdom </span>of Israel, the region where most Samaritans live even today. But texts like this may not actually get us any closer to understanding the Samaritans’ historical origins.
The Samaritans, for their part, did not accept any scriptural texts beyond the Pentateuch. Scholars have known for a long time about an ancient and distinctly Samaritan version of the Pentateuch—which has been an important source for textual criticism of the Bible for centuries. In fact, a major indication for a growing Samaritan self-awareness in antiquity was the insertion of "typically Samaritan" additions into this version of the Pentateuch, such as a Decalogue commandment to build an altar on Mount Gerizim, which Samaritans viewed as the sole “place of blessing” (see also Deut 11:29, Deut 27:12). They fiercely rejected Jerusalem—which is not mentioned by name in the Pentateuch—and all Jerusalem-related traditions and institutions such as kingship and messianic eschatology.
The nation that attended the Congress of Panama in 1826 in the options was A. Columbia.
<h3>What was the Congress of Panama?</h3>
In 1826, Simón Bolívar called for the Congress of Panama which was to help the newly independent Latin American republics to come up with a unified policy.
Columbia attended but Brazil did not. Chile and Argentina did not like how influential Simón Bolívar was and so did not attend either.
Find out more on the Simon Bolivar at brainly.com/question/1402690.
#SPJ12
The control of the u.s of most of the north america territory
