1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kozerog [31]
3 years ago
13

How was the gulf of tonkin resolution different from the war powers resolution of 1973

History
2 answers:
Volgvan3 years ago
6 0

The correct answer is C) The Gulf of Tokin Resolution increased the president’s wartime powers, while the War Powers Resolution limited them.

<em>The difference between The Gulf of Tokin Resolution and the War Powers Resolution of 1973 is that the Gulf of Tokin Resolution increased the president’s wartime powers, while the War Powers Resolution limited them. </em>

The Gulf of Tokin Resolution was enacted on August 10, 1964. It increased the power of the president. In this case, Lyndon B. Jhonson, to use the military force without the approval of the Congress. The War Powers Resolution of 1973 limited the power of president Richard Nixon to declare war. Congress needed to authorize the declaration of war.

S_A_V [24]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

c

Explanation:

You might be interested in
EASY BRAINLIEST PLEASE HELP!!
Tema [17]

swer:An

b the anser is b

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
(PLESEEE ANSWERR ITS DUE TODAYY)According to this time line, Magellan’s crew completed their first voyage between which two even
kati45 [8]
The Magellan’s crew completed their first voyage between when Matin Luther promoted Church reform in 1517 and Cartier claims Canada for France in 1534.
3 0
3 years ago
Why did Hitler launch operation Barbarossa?
Digiron [165]
Fun fact Hitler was an artist he wasn’t that bad honestly this boy was fresh with it but then they rejected him and then he became a killer cosas sad
4 0
3 years ago
List three factors that caused Africa to become a growing source of slaves for the slave trade
Vera_Pavlovna [14]
1. Africans were easier to spot, color denoted their bondage status, there was nowhere to run once they were taken.

2. Africans were exposed to those who had them in bondage for quite some time, meaning they had developed immunities to many of the trifling diseases their captors carried. So they were viewed as healthier.

3. Some Africans willingly sold their enemies (who were already in slavery/ prisoners of war) in exchange for products like guns, grain, and fabrics.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Was the Declaration of Independence intended to be a formal declaration of war? Why or why not?
Oduvanchick [21]
No the Declaration of Independence was not intended to be a formal declaration of war since "<span>There was no need to declare war, as this power had yet to be established" and because it was implied. </span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What does "equality" mean in the judicial system?
    14·1 answer
  • How did migration lead to the population of the world?
    5·2 answers
  • What resulted from the First Crusade?
    12·2 answers
  • Who is this (history needed) is school related
    10·1 answer
  • I need help what is unique about italy geography that allowed it to become a hub for trade
    14·1 answer
  • How did the slave trade hurt the continent of Africa?
    13·1 answer
  • What was Tin Pan Alley and why was it important?
    7·1 answer
  • How did ancient people move into North America and into Texas?
    13·1 answer
  • Interpretasyon ayon kay buckingham
    10·1 answer
  • 20 POINTS FOR THE ANSWER
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!